Talk:Baltimore class cruiser

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Baltimore class cruiser article. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (`~~~~`). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

Additional information:

	This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: `<!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. -->` `\|B-Class-1=yes/no` `<!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. -->` `\|B-Class-2=yes/no` `<!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. -->` `\|B-Class-3=yes/no` `<!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. -->` `\|B-Class-4=yes/no` `<!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. -->` `\|B-Class-5=yes/no`
Related task forces (general topics):
	Maritime warfare task force
Related task forces (nations and regions):
	United States military history task force
Related task forces (periods and conflicts):
	World War II task force

The Des Moines class should be entirely deperate from the Baltimore class. It was a different hull, with a different main armament. Similarities are superficial

[edit] "most successful class of 8 inch-armed heavy cruiser in history"

Anyone care to back this up? I can't think of any reason to claim the Baltimores were more successful than, say, the Royal Navy County Class cruisers. I understand that there is a powerful urge to claim that "US is Best" on Wikipedia, but this kind of unsubstanciated tosh is of no benefit to anyone. The Baltimores were a successful design - isn't saying that enough? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Getztashida (talk • contribs) 15:25, 5 December 2006 (UTC).

In lieu of a citation for most sucessful, I have rewritten the intro to show what the class did achieve in terms of long service life and offspring. GraemeLeggett 15:48, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

The new introdution is muh more informative. Thanks very much. Getztashida 14:51, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../b/a/l/Talk%7EBaltimore_class_cruiser_6838.html"

Categories: Start-Class maritime warfare articles | Maritime warfare task force articles | Start-Class United States military history articles | United States military history task force articles | Start-Class World War II articles | World War II task force articles | Start-Class military history articles