Talk:Battle of Orgreave
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Organized Labour, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Organized Labour. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. |
| Low | This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale. |
| If you have rated this article please consider adding assessment comments. |
How neutral is this entry?
"the only option open to the police (short of grinning and bearing it) was further charges"
The only option? This is but one of many examples of semantic hedging to be found throughout the text. Interestingly, it has very specific details regarding the events prior to the "battle real", clearly portraying the miners as agressors, but becomes decidedly hazy and vague as the police go on the offensive (apart from concrete excuses like the one above). Despite the later paragraphs, based on incontrovertible fact - it seems to me that this is a rather slanted article, favouring the police side of events.
09:59, 9 June 2006 (UTC) Mark
Naturally i agree, i remember that day and it doesnt seem like the one documented. I remember the first charge and lots of me mates being clubbed around the heads with truncheons. The problem with wikipedia is you cant report an eye witness account if you were there!!But if you workrd for the BBC you can!Ukbn2 10:09, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
