Talk:Battle of That Al-Sawari

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.

Additional information:

	This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: `<!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. -->` `\|B-Class-1=yes/no` `<!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. -->` `\|B-Class-2=yes/no` `<!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. -->` `\|B-Class-3=yes/no` `<!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. -->` `\|B-Class-4=yes/no` `<!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. -->` `\|B-Class-5=yes/no`
Related task forces (general topics):
	Maritime warfare task force
Related task forces (periods and conflicts):
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500–c. 1500)

1 What the hell it is ....????
2 Yes they did
3 Changed
4 We need 50mg Adrenaline here - STAT!

[edit] What the hell it is ....????

muslims had no navy up to 650 A.D how could this naval battle could took place in 634 A.D ??????

Mohammad Adil 12:32, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Yes they did

Of course they did. Syllaeum was not a total crushing defeat. Besides, Arabs were excellent ship builders - they did give rise to the empire of Carthage. So they must have had a naval fleet. Tourskin.

Oh wait a minute. Damn you're right. What the hell? Vandalism has occured. The date is definetly not 634 AD. It should be after 677 AD becuase thats when Syllaeum took place. Tourskin.

[edit] Changed

Well I changed the date to > 677 becuase that would make the campaign box look stupid if an earlier battle was placed later in the series. I looked at some websites and it claimed a loss of 500 Greek ships. This is highly unlikely, considering the Byzantines were able to use their navy at 717 AD again and that Syllaeum had defeated the Arabs. Tourskin 17:03, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] We need 50mg Adrenaline here - STAT!

Even my stubs have more info than this one. We can't assert anything from this article. All we know is that there was a naval battle. We don't even know who won - the Byzantines couldn't have lost because they had a naval victory before and after this one and the Arabs couldn't have lost because they had the ability to ferry in troops in teh second siege of constantinople.Tourskin 20:00, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../b/a/t/Talk%7EBattle_of_That_Al-Sawari_e9c7.html"

Categories: Stub-Class maritime warfare articles | Maritime warfare task force articles | Stub-Class Medieval warfare articles | Medieval warfare task force articles | Stub-Class military history articles