Talk:Bell 427/429

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Aviation, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles related to aviation. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

Aviation Portal

Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the quality scale.
(comments)

Additional information:

	This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: `<!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. -->` `\|B-Class-1=yes/no` `<!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. -->` `\|B-Class-2=yes/no` `<!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. -->` `\|B-Class-3=yes/no` `<!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. -->` `\|B-Class-4=yes/no` `<!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. -->` `\|B-Class-5=yes/no`
Related WikiProjects and/or task forces:
	Rotorcraft task force

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was the article was moved to the current name. --Born2flie 04:22, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

1 Requested merger

[edit] Requested merger

Bell 429 → Bell 427 — Overlappngs subject matter, one is a derivitive of the other, and minimal content on each page. - BillCJ 19:18, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Survey

Add * '''Support''' or * '''Oppose''' on a new line followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.

[edit] Discussion

Keeping all the content under Bell 427 may only be a temporary measure, as the 429 looks to be the major future production model. As such, using Bell 427 for the content would also be acceptable, as would Bell 427/429. This may well depend on how successful the 429 is. - BillCJ 19:18, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Decision

No contest, will merge. In addition, I will move this page to Bell 427/429, but will not oppose if it is moved back to "Bell 427" (or "Bell 429 either, just not both). - BillCJ 05:57, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../b/e/l/Talk%7EBell_427_429_1f61.html"

Categories: Stub-Class rotorcraft articles | Stub-Class aviation articles