User talk:Benny45boy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Welcome
Welcome to my talk page, not that I really expect anyone to use this all to much, as I only edit Wikipedia infrequently. However I will reply on my talk page to any comments, unless you ask me that I reply elsewhere. Benny45boy 12:05, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Welcome
Hello, Benny45boy, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Addhoc 12:58, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] BA
Hi. "Verbally in internal meetings" is totally unacceptable as a citation. A major plank of Wikipedia is "assume good faith", and I do assume you're telling the truth. However please recognise that anybody could say anything and explain it away as "internal communication". Might I also suggest that it is a breach of confidence to post such information here? The company I work for is very clear that internal communications are confidential and are not to be made public without prior consent. Mark83 13:29, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
Hi Benny45boy, I have added something to the BA talk page on the Cross wearing controversy - also please excuse my removing part of your talk page discussion - but I have explained why on the page. I agree with you about a separate article. Springnuts 22:56, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
- Re: your comment on the cross controversy stuff (now at British Airways cross controversy). It was a lot more biased than it is now - I have been trying to insert more criticisms, though some have been reverted. Jsteph 07:42, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
