User talk:Bhumiya
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Race movie
Thank you for creating race movie. I was quite surprised to learn that it did not already exist in Wikipedia, and I appreciate that you've taken the time to create it. It looks good so far, so I have nominated the article for WP:DYK, and I hope to see it there in a few days. NatusRoma | Talk 08:54, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image Tagging Image:Germanic language zones2.PNG
 |
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Germanic language zones2.PNG. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam (T/C) 11:34, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Kurd stub
Have you seen?
--Mais oui! 06:38, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:う.PNG
Thanks for uploading Image:う.PNG. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Shyam (T/C) 06:47, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Kogal.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Kogal.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 13:57, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Award
Wow, I don't know what to say! (Other than that I was forced to look up "prolificacy" and "Barbara Cartland") -- ha ha. Two awards in one week, that is really something. I'm glad my contribution is appreciated and hope to run into you on more articles in the future. Badagnani 02:50, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Poster
I think it looks good. Unfortunately, I wish we had a higher res image of it for use here. K1Bond007 05:36, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
- I'm thinking that it wasn't supposed to be released just yet, thus the really low quality. That's pretty bad for Sony. I mean, have you seen the stuff they kicked out for their other AAA franchises like SpiderMan 3? You can already get hi-res promotional stuff etc and that movie is about a year off (granted that they can photoshop that together, rather than something like Bond where they need something a little more real). I hope they release something soon though. K1Bond007 05:56, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Basilosaurus Image
The image is missing the back legs, which were tiny. I also think that Basilosaurus had a fluke a tad bit bigger than that. GBA 18:50, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Barnstar
 |
The Barnstar of Good Humor | |
| You are, to be sure, eminently deserving of a barnstar for your substantive contributions (both to articles and at the language reference desk, in view of positive experiences at which many first-time visitors join the project), or even of one for the fact of remarkable concordance of the various stances enumerated on your user page with my views, but I think you to be, as I, inclined to jocularity, so I bestow this barnstar on you in appreciation not only of the general cordiality you radiate but also of the specific provenance of your user name, which I find particularly amusing. Joe 22:28, 18 June 2006 (UTC) |
- I'm altogether sorry for having taken nearly a month to reply to your query; I hope you won't infer from my dereliction anything other than that, having, consistent with my obsessive tendencies, undertaken several projects here, I worked on those projects to the exclusion of all else. My bad. Inasmuch as I am anarcho-libertarian, you wondered how I'd appraise the Libertarian Party of America and its platform; it was not, by the way, at all untoward for you to ask, and so the expresssion of your concern that the question was inappropriate was, although appreciated, wholly unnecessary. In any event, I have done a bit of organizing with the LP of Wisconsin but prefer generally to work to support libertarian-minded candidates in the Democratic Party (with whom we'd generally associate the Democratic Leadership Council, although I don't know that such a conflation would be accurate nowadays), if only because the prospects of any third party in the United States aren't particularly propitious. I do think the Free State Project to be an excellent idea, one that surely holds the best chance for the proliferation writ large of libertarian ideals, and I could imagine myself living in New Hampshire someday in furtherance of the Project. I've had occasion to attend many Democratic Party gatherings–indeed, I've been fortunate to have shaken the hands of each of the last three Democratic candidates for president, and, since I've gotten to know Russ Feingold rather well, perhaps the next one as well–and I often define myself, rather provocatively, I suppose, as a Dixiecrat: neither do I support government-enforced segregation nor do I support government proscriptions on private segregation, largely because I'm disinclined to support government at all and certainly hold absolute liberty of contract most dear. The Dixiecrats, though, were wholly wrong on many things, and so I think the Democratic Party that I support to be not unlike the Republican Party of Taft and Harding, et al.. One problem (of many, of course) with which the LP is faced, I think, is that the former member most prominent, Ron Paul, is affiliated with the Republican Party and, more to the point, believes that the state may (and should) pass legislation interdicting abortion; most in the LP, I think, as I, find abortion to be an issue of property rights, of which the proper disposition should be the same disposition we'd support vis-à-vis assisted suicide or drug use, viz., that the state ought to keep its hands off one's body. The LP is also (and perhaps irredeemably) associated with objectivism or amorality, such that many believe that, in the absence of certain government compulsions, individuals will not care for others in society. Even as I tend toward the amoral and objectivist and can't say for certain that I would/will be an eleemosynarily-inclined individual, and even as I might term provincial the moral schema by which many American are "afflcited", I recognize that there will not, at least for some time, be support for a party that appears not "to care about American citizens" (witness the horrific march of the Republican Party from small to giant government, under the guise, in part, of compassionate conversatism). The only views for which I have less tolerance than those advanced by progressives, who tend, IMHO, toward the irrational, are those advanced by neo- and religious conservatives, and so I am usually in sympathy with the Democratic Party, which I think, in fact, to be the more libertarian of the two major parties (and certainly of late given the shift of the RP under Bush); I will vote for LP candidates, but only if the eventual outcome of a given race is evident or if it is impossible to choose the lesser evil from amongst two candidates whose views are repugnant to libertarianism. My rule against voting for Republicans isn't categorical—I've supported two, one in a titularly non-partisan local race and one in a US House race in which the Democratic candidate, a doctrinaire progressive, was sure to win, and thus only symbolically—but I can't foresee another circumstance under which I'd vote for a Republican, nor one under which I would think the Libertarian Party to be a viable political entity. It is better, I think, to change a major party from within (since some people will always support a party in view of its history and name, irrespective of its contemporary constitution) than to grow a minority party. So, there ya go. Never should you ask me an open-ended question, as you'll get, well, this (feel free, of course, to remove from your talk page
afterbefore reading, in order that you shouldn't exceed the 32kb suggestion with one message. Joe 21:57, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Photos of executions in the PRC
Why you retain that this photos were shooted in the late 1980's and not in the late 1990's or 2000 (I retain that this photos are false)? --Vess 10:35, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] "Giant hotel room"
I believe this quote regarding Canada (or something like it) is from Mordecai Richler. A quick Google doesn't give much but hotel ads, but maybe you can find it.
Re religion stats: declared non-religious may be similar but of more importance IMO is religious practice and attendance. I regularly read that about half as many Canadians go to church as Americans, though you'll probably find varying figures (people tend to lie about it, apparently). Marskell 17:07, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Executions in the PRC
I retain that this photos of executions in the PRC are false because I retain that the PRC don't execut juvenile and because I don't belief that in the PRC the prisoners are forcedto kneel before execution. --Vess 19:29, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
I retain that the victims are juvenile by face and by structure of body of victims. Regarding the position of victims, are you sure that the victims stay volutary on kneel position? --Vess 10:56, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
PS: in the PRC there is odious violation of human rights and I don't ammire this country. On another site I viewed that the peoples executed on this photo committed the crimes of "fomenting rebellion".
Why you don't answer to me? --Vess 21:03, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image tagging for Image:Butler.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Butler.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:10, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Groussac.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Groussac.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:25, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Finishlow2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Finishlow2.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 21:28, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Articles for Deletion: Holophonor and Planet Express Ship
As pointed out by Stardust8212, both the Planet Express Ship and Holophonor articles are currently marked for deletion. Your comments thereon would be really appreciated. DrWho42 06:19, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] AfD Nomination: Exophilia
I've nominated the article Exophilia for deletion under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Exophilia satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. I have explained why in the nomination space (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exophilia. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them. You are free to edit the content of Exophilia during the discussion, but please do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top). Doing so will not end the discussion. --CyberGhostface 00:01, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] The Boys In The Band
You made an edit to this article (about Pauline Kael) which was later reverted. I agree with you about the edit and have reinstated it. Just thought you'd like to know. Jeffpw 08:53, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
- I left the rest of it, because the reference provided does make that claim. Here is the quote directly from the "Bright Lights" article: "Critics mostly approved, with the notable exception of the arguably homophobic Pauline Kael, who inexplicably hated Friedkin and rejected anything he did." However, the sentence as you wrote it on my talk page does cover the same ground, and is much more NPOV. Jeffpw 09:12, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Invitation
You are kindly invited to join the WikiProject Argentina and the Argentine regional notice board. Mariano(t/c) 12:52, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
- Hi! You can add any bew biography of any Argentine person at the Notice Board, that will tell other users whom ight want to expand any Argentine-related article. Thanks, and good wiking, Mariano(t/c) 16:03, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Change to Common.css
Per recent discussions, the way in which Persondata is viewed by Wikipedia editors has changed. In order to continue viewing Persondata in Wikipedia articles, please edit your user CSS file to display table.persondata rather than table.metadata. More specific instructions can be found on the Persondata page. --ShakingSpirittalk on behalf of Kaldari 00:43, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image tagging for Image:O'Lachlan.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:O'Lachlan.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:42, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Hardtack
What exactly was innacurate (and what did you change) specifically. I might debate, but I need info. Since your user talk page is quite full, I would request that you try my own page, which is blank. Therefore, it would be quite quicker in response time.
[edit] Pirámide de Mayo
Me da gusto que hayas traducido el artículo sobre la Pirámide de Mayo, del cual soy su principal editor. Soy colaborador de la wiki española y uno de mis temas preferidos son los monumentos y obras arquitectónicas de Buenos Aires.
Cualquier cosa, a tu disposición.--Roberto Fiadone 12:01, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
