Image talk:Blaconstn.jpg
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Wrong license
The person who supplied the image says:
"I can't remeber where I found the picture. i suspect someone sent it to me when I was putting the cycleway site together at the height of the CDTS hoo-hah."
Consequently, it cannot be given the applied license. TerriersFan 17:37, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- You write "it cannot be given the applied license" Can it be used at ::all then? Why not tell me?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Twinney12 (talk • contribs).
-
- That is NOT correct!!
-
- I wrote: IF; IF, IF, IF!
-
- This is what I wrote:"if it cannot be given the applied license Can it be used at all then? Why not tell me?" Twinney12 12:19, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- Eh? What you wrote is here. HTH. TerriersFan 17:05, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- Hmmmmmmn! Doesn't change anything; you were still being unhelpful, by not replying to the question:"Can it be used at all then? Why not tell me?" I am new to all this and am trying my best! Twinney12 21:43, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- As it happens, I was sorting out a new license when you decided to go with (fairold). You have been given a lot of help, and some of us are happy to help further, but a less confrontational approach would serve you well! TerriersFan 23:29, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- Hmmmmmmn! Doesn't change anything; you were still being unhelpful, by not replying to the question:"Can it be used at all then? Why not tell me?" I am new to all this and am trying my best! Twinney12 21:43, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- Eh? What you wrote is here. HTH. TerriersFan 17:05, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- This is what I wrote:"if it cannot be given the applied license Can it be used at all then? Why not tell me?" Twinney12 12:19, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Next Question
Can you reply to this? You wrote:"This article has now been deleted as copyvio since it was taken from a website without demonstrating specific permission. Please be careful since Wikipedia has a zero tolerance policy on copyright violations. TerriersFan 01:33, 12 December 2006 (UTC)"
- [edit] My Question
- Mr. TerriersFan, My question refers to the quote above. I didn't need permission as there was a link to download the .PDF file. However, there are some relevant pages about Blacon on the govt's pathfinder site which can be downloaded, but cannot be viewed ON that site.
- To view them you have to download them. Can I upload them to the Blacon Wiki for readers to view, as I do with an image? Cheers for the edits, the site is looking well! Twinney12 12:48, 13 December 2006 (UTC) Tony" Twinney12 21:53, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
-
- Sorry, but you did need permission since whether you viewed it, or downloaded it, the copyright rested with the author. I linked the Blacon article to the Word document directly, but you deleted the link. I have now linked the article to the webpage. If there are further resources, to which you wish to refer, then it's fine to link to them but there is no provision to embed Word, PDF, etc. files in the article. Please let me know if I can help, further. TerriersFan 23:35, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use for Blacon railway station
- the photo is only being used for informational purposes.
[edit] Rationale
The image has been displayed on the http://www.bwpics.co.uk/railstroll/rail18.html website for several years, after a resident sent in to the site for publication. The picture owner/photographer's details are not available and it (the copyright) would appear to be in the public domain due to it's uncontested use in the same (internet) medium for many years.
