Bojayá massacre
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Colombian Armed Conflicts
|
|---|
| General Overview: |
| Colombian Armed Conflict (1960s - present) |
| Plan Colombia |
| U.S.-Colombia relations |
| Human rights in Colombia |
| Colombian Armed forces: |
| Military of Colombia |
| Guerrillas: |
| FARC-EP |
| ELN |
| EPL |
| Paramilitaries: |
| Paramilitarism |
| Former groups: |
| AUC |
| AAA |
| M19 |
| MOEC |
| CGSB |
| Historical Events: |
| Santa Marta Massacre (1928) |
| La Violencia |
| Marquetalia Republic |
| Dominican embassy (1980) |
| Palace of Justice (1985) |
| Patriotic Union Party (UP) |
| Mapiripán Massacre (1997) |
| FARC-Government peace process (1999-2002) |
| Bojayá massacre (2002) |
| Parapolitica scandal |
| Lawsuits: |
| Sinaltrainal v. Coca-Cola |
| Rodriquez v. Drummond |
| Political parties: |
| Conservative Party |
| Liberal Party |
| Communist Party |
| PCCC |
The Bojayá massacre occurred on May 2, 2002 in the Colombian town of Bojayá (with its urban centre also referred to as Bellavista), in Chocó department. FARC guerrillas seized the town in an attempt to take control of the Atrato River region from AUC paramilitaries, in the process killing approximately 119 civilians in an apparently indiscriminate attack with an improvised homemade mortar assembled with gas cylinders parts (known in Spanish as pipeta or Cilindro bomba).
Contents |
[edit] Background
As previously noted by the Colombian government, "the armed confrontation in the region between the guerrillas and the illegal self-defence forces is very violent due to the economic and strategic interests in play, including, among others: drug trafficking, the inter-oceanic connection, the development of megaprojects like the Panamerican Highway, and the proximity of ports and hydroelectric stations. The region furthermore represents advantages for these groups as a route for the import of arms and supplies from Central America and to provide favourable routes for drug trafficking." [1]
[edit] Preceding Events
At least 250 paramilitary combatants moved into Bellavista on 21 April, 2002, and remained in the populated area despite protests by local residents. The UNHCHR sent an official communication to the Colombian government on April 23 expressing their concern regarding the presence of the paramilitaries and the possible consequences for the local people. The Public Ombudsman (Defensoría del Pueblo) also visited the region on April 26 and released an early warning regarding the possible consequences of an armed confrontation in the area.[2]
Intense fighting broke out on May 1st in neighbouring Vigía del Fuerte municipality (Antioquia department), and spread to Bellavista later in the day. Residents took shelter in the local church, the adjoining parsonage and an Augustinian Missionary residence, with the total number approaching 500 over the course of the night. [2]
[edit] Details of the attack
According to the official UN investigation report, in the morning of May 2nd the AUC paramilitaries had established positions around the church, using the buildings and the cement wall around the church yard for protection. The FARC took up positions to the north (in Barrio Pueblo Nuevo), and began launching gas cylinder bombs (pipetas) toward the paramilitary positions, with two landing nearby but the third going through the roof of the church and exploding on the altar.
The explosion caused approximately 119 dead and 98 wounded, though the UN was not able to verify exact numbers. A large number of the dead and wounded were children.[2]
The UN investigation found the FARC in violation of several principles of international humanitarian law, including an indiscriminate attack causing unnecessary civilian casualties, failure to distinguish between civilian and combatant, failure to take efforts to protect civilians from avoidable harm, and attacks against cultural property. Prohibitions against these acts are found in Common Article 3 of the 1949 Geneva Conventions and Articles 4, 13, and 16 of Additional Protocol II. The UN also considered the FARC responsible for the forced displacement generated as a consequence of the attack on the church, placing the act in violation of Article 17 of Protocol II. [2]
The UN also found the AUC in violation of various aspects of international humanitarian law, including using civilians as human shields, failing to protect civilians from the effects of their military operations, and for causing massive forced displacement of civilian populations in the region due to their acts, threats and combat operations in the area. Given reports of theft by the AUC of goods, equipment and vehicles belonging to local residents, the UN also found the AUC guilty of pillage (a violation of Article 17 of Protocol II).[2]
The UNHCHR also found that the Colombian government failed to act in order to prevent the massive human suffering resulting from the events in Bojaya - suffering that was predicted and of which the government was explicitly warned beforehand.[2]
[edit] Notes
- ^ Ministerio de Defensa Nacional. Informe Anual Derechos Humanos y DIH 2000. República de Colombia, Ministerio de Defensa Nacional, pp.132,133.
- ^ a b c d e f UNHCHR (20 May 2002). Informe de la Oficina en Colombia del Alto Comisionado de las Naciones Unidas para los Derechos Humanos sobre su Misión de Observación en el Medio Atrato. Oficina en Colombia del Alto Comisionado de las Naciones Unidas para los Derechos Humanos.
 |
This crime-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
 |
This Colombia-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
