Talk:Borescope
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Several external links were recently removed with they claim they were "spammy" while another external link was left. Presumably the editor left the one external link because they did not feel it was spammy. I have been searching the policy pages and found no clear definition for spammy links. The links which were removed add information to the page on How to choose a borescope and various borescope technologies. They include diagrams to help the interested reader see more clearly what a borescope looks like and how it is constructed. All 3 links (the 2 deleted and the 1 left) point to pages on web sites of borescope manufacturers who would obviously like it if a reader decided to buy their products. None of the pages are "sales" pages and if the reader wants to explore one of the sites further, then that is their prerogative.
[edit] External links
Please elaborate on what makes an external link worth of inclusion versus spammy. LandyAtkinson 14:26, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
