Talk:Brandi Sherwood
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ] (If you rated the article, please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
||
 |
It is requested that a picture or pictures of this person be included in this article to improve its quality. Note: Wikipedia's fair use policy almost never permits the use of "fair use" images (such as promotional photos, press photos, screenshots, book covers and similar) to merely show what a living person looks like. Efforts should be made to take a free licensed photo during a public appearance, or obtaining a free content release of an existing photo instead. |
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Beauty Pageants, a WikiProject related to beauty pageants, their contestants and winners. |
[edit] Sexual Abuse
Are the details of her sexual abuse really appropriate here? Since the lawsuit is public, reference to it and an outline of the allegations seems fine to me, and the link to more information at The Smoking Gun. But the rest of it? Rbraunwa 18:12, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
This is an important part of her life. The scandal has been pushed under the table and ignored. This influenced the rest of her life. It is important imho.
99jonathan 00:11, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
- I don't have a problem covering this, if its widely reported. But, its absolutely essential that each and every fact be properly cited (with independent, reliable sources). A lawsuit, by itself, is not an adequate source. This is simply what she's claiming. If the lawsuit it the only source, than the article shouldn't say much more than than the fact she filed the suit. --Rob 04:09, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
- So far, you've failed to provide any sources for any of your salacious stories, 99. The overly intimate, voyeuristic style of the writing, which is extremely inappropriate for an encyclopedia, also leads me to the same conclusion, which is that you are a troll or a vandal. If I've mistaken you, then I'm sorry. The best way to disillusion me of this belief would be to add reliable sourcing for your claims and present them in a dignified and encyclopedic manner. Or hell, just provide the reliable sources and I'll rewrite your claims into suitability. Please stop citing other Wikipedia articles and claiming it's "sourcing". This isn't an echo chamber.
- If you continue to add your stories of these events without sourcing, I'm going to be forced to assume they're your fabrication and revert them on sight. Thanks. -Kasreyn 07:47, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
