Talk:Brittany Andrews
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ] | ||
[edit] Uncited info
To the editor who added the following, please provide citations per policy. Thanks.
- At some point in the early to mid 1990s Andrews gave birth as she shows up very pregnant in a low end amateur pregnant video footage put out by JEG Productions. In this she is nearly unrecognizable with red hair,tattoos & minus the goth/dom look she's famous for now. But the face, nose, mouth, eyebrows & ears give it away as young Brittany Andrews.
-- Joe Beaudoin Jr. Think out loud 01:22, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
100% LIE re. pregnant.
January 3, 2007 Joe Beaudoin Jr., ANOTHER performer (a REAL superstar) who you didn't immediatly revert back to lies and delusions.
Thanks? (For keeping the/MY corrections. BTW: that comes from the word "correct!")
Next day: I wrote too soon. You went right back to your biased harmful bullshit.
(I ask you, again, why does Angela Oliver get special protection and her total fabrications remain as gospel?)
Funny that Angela Oliver has -- according to YOU -- the same exact hight and the same exact weight as Brittany, however, Brit. (in real life) is much taller than your A.Sin/A.O. and MUCH MUCH thinner!! BTW: You have your own source of 140 pounds, for "A. Sin."
What's your problem?
You will never do right. You will never listen. You will hopefully close down, soon.
Enough fighting all of you biased ignorant delusional jerks. "Civil?" What a one-sided joke!
- Provide a verifiable and reliable source (I suggest you click the links) for your claims, otherwise they'll be removed per policy. As for the corrections you made, they were removal of uncited content (namely her alleged name), so they weren't reverted. (OOPS: A HUGE LIE!!!!) In addition, I will tell you that your sarcasm will not get you anywhere here and borders on uncivility. Constructive criticsm is welcome, but not vitrol. Good day. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. Think out loud 06:23, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Liar: You certainly DID put an alleged "real" name back?!?!
you lie, you "protect" scum and you intentionally with malice aforethought blast harmful, possibly dangerous, erroneous information all over the Internet. Who the hell do you think you are????
You said that you are so worried about YOU getting sued? ha! THAT'S your made-up "public" reason? Liar. AND second source BS does NOT protect you. I'll go direct to sources & you can have have fun spending a fortune defending yourself.
that's all she wrote! get lost.
- Judging by your comments, you don't understand that I'm not the only contributor to Wikipedia—there are literally thousands, upon thousands of people who contribute to Wikipedia. For the record, I did not revert your changes, User:Valrith did. (See the edit history, which keeps track of who edits the page and what they added). Other than your personal attacks, I believe that you are here only to agitate people instead of working with us, but you are more than welcome to prove me wrong after you 48 hour (2 day) ban has expired. If you have verified and reliable sources, provide them, otherwise don't add the information. Thanks. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. Think out loud 22:05, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
