User talk:Brinticus
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello and Welcome! I hope you like the place. --mav
Hi! I liked the thoughts you put down on the immortality article. Im hesitant to go in and chop to make it flow encyclopedically. I just thought id check in to see if you had any thoughts as far as breaking it up into logical parts, while still retaining its depth. -Stevert
I'm still going to write a bit more on the article. My plans are to address (something akin to) a spiritual angle on the immortality issue. So far I've only addressed the physical angle on things. -Brint
OK. I hope I dont step on your toes, by adding/ choping anything. One thing I will say that the material you added seems to be in the style of a talk. This should probably be condensed, though, Im sure your working on it...
I'll be adding "technological immortality" as category, and a possible fix to Cousteau's stated conundrum; it may be something prime for tackling. -Stevert
Contents |
[edit] Brain imaging
I would like to invite you to the discussion at Talk:Brain_imaging. Pjacobi 09:19, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC)
[edit] First Crusade spoken word
Hi - the template is a red link, no such file. -- Stbalbach 02:20, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for your participation in the spoken wikipedia. Just so you know, I don't think this is on the project page, but in light of some issues on the AIDS page, I put the spoken version in the references section. I used the same strategy on the crusade page in light of the absence of an external links section since it's closer to the normal procedure.
- The other thing is that (and I've done this too, so it's no biggie) the version you uploaded starts at section 1 without the introduction and statement of the topic. Could you fix that and re-upload it? Thanks again! Moulder 03:34, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
BTW just wanted to say I listed to it last night and thought it was pretty good .. some sections of the article flow better than others - not your speech, but the text - so hearing it out-loud brings attention to some areas that could be improved and clarified. The pronunciations must have been a killer. -- Stbalbach 16:09, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Three Laws of Robotics
By all means, please go for it and record the spoken-version of the article! I was planning at one point to create it, but then life (as it is wont to do) got quite busy for me; thanks for following up on that, and I look forward to seeing (and hearing) your work! (The Swami 22:09, 10 August 2006 (UTC))
- If you're working on that, you might want to update the message on Talk:Three Laws of Robotics. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 04:30, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Hey
How are you doing Lieutenant Sulu? --E tac 19:51, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
