Talk:Calnar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Calnar article. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

This article is part of WikiProject Dragonlance, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the Dragonlance universe. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

[edit] Stub

Ah, how the stubs annoy me...anyway, can the stub be taken off? If not, what more does it need? DoomsDay349 00:22, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Merge

There is very little info on this subject, which is why I merged it with List of Dragonlance creatures. Give a good reason why it should stay an article...also, I'll be re-stubbing it. DoomsDay349 17:51, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

I'd agree with merge and redirect. ddcc 02:30, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

The article is not short. Without the template the article has 1.5k letters and with templates the average of the English Wikipedia is 3k per article (with the 23% of articles that have less than 0,5 and 67% that have less than 2Kb). The List of Dragonlance creatures has 21k letters: it's too large and must be split. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.36.151.89 (talk • contribs) 03:47, September 4, 2006.

The List of DL creatures, as well as many other DL lists, is undergoing talks to possible merges. Note that the DL wikipedia community is not very large, so it may take a while. But this is beside the point. You make a fine point in the fact that it is not really short, but there is no more or very little info that can be added to it. Now a stub is an article that says what the subject matter is, but not why it is so important to have it's own article. This article does not present to me why it must have it's own article, and thus a merge and redirect is best. Unless of course you can expand it to such a point where it can be an article, but it's still best to merge, redirect, and work on it there. Personally, it doesn't matter much to me that it is long enough, there is simply not enough to be said for an article. DoomsDay349 23:29, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Another point I'd like to make is that most other dwarf clan articles are redirects to List of DL creatures. DoomsDay349 23:30, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Lemme Clear This Up

If you noticed an rv by AntiVandalBot, forgive me-I re-merged this page and forgot the redirect. I have corrected this. DoomsDay349 22:21, 7 September 2006 (UTC)