From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d294/1d2944c2617019f54fa0ebf9c7b9aede5f26f6b5" alt="" |
This article is part of WikiProject Fire Service, which collaborates on fire service-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
Start |
This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale. |
Suggested article edit guidelines:
- To help us prioritise our workload, and in readiness for Wikipedia:1.0, we need to assess our articles for Quality. If this article is Unassessed, please assess it. See the Article Classification for instructions. If you disagree with a rating, you can change it or discuss it at Article Classification.
- After assessing this article's quality, please make sure it to add it to the Lists at Article Classification, following the grading scheme detailed there.
|
This article has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it needs.
|
I don't understand the use of "purpose built" in the first sentence. Aren't all aircraft purpose built? HistoryBA 19:53, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
- You have to take it in context of the sentence, the aircraft was purpose built for fire fighting, where as other aircraft may be for cargo transport, passenger transport, etc. -Dawson 17:45, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
- Which gets back to my original question, aren't all aircraft purpose-built? HistoryBA 20:28, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
- Not really. Many are designed to serve multiple roles, while purpose-built aircraft are designed with one singular purpose in mind. -Dawson 21:13, 19 March 2006 (UTC)