Talk:Candy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
To do: explain temperatures and results; link to appropriate sub-articles (like fudge); explain traditional temperature tests (like soft-ball stage). -- Dominus 05:30 Apr 20, 2003 (UTC)
This page has pussy pussy and more pussy. Why do so many articles on Wikipedia go out of their way to chide North America about English usage. Has a word never changed meaning in the UK? Anyway, I'm fixing it. Daniel Quinlan 04:56, Aug 23, 2003 (UTC)
The term "confectionery" is the only one that's neutral. If you use the word "candy", that's an American POV, if you use the word "sweet", it's a British POV. The chiding is often to do with exactly what you've just done by using the American POV word even if non-American english speakers object.
I'm removing the 'list of candies' because it doesn't give you any information you wouldn't get by just clicking on the "Category:Confectionery" link. Further, these category pages keep themselves up to date. The list in this article only lists a fraction of the 'candy articles'. ike9898 01:50, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Removal of branded names from candy types
Should we remove such things as Reese bits from candy types? It's too specific, and, what's worse, brand specific.
[edit] Candyarian?
What's the adjective for someone who eats only candy? Jarrod 04:25, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
- Various options that spring to mind (depending on how long they've been doing this for) include "fat" and "dead". If you do have a reason to use the term, I'm sure there's no law against coining "candyarian" to serve. (There is some paranoia against using words that aren't in the dictionary, but I doubt most dictionaries include the word "eats". The important thing is if you're understood, and if it suits the context.)
- Of course, "candarian" is a bit dangerous because it's based on a dialect-specific term; you might find Australians then discussing "lolliarians". Perhaps it could be based on "confectionery" which is dialect-neutral albeit formal, thus giving "confectionerian" (I imagine a "confectionarian" is someone who eats places that sell confeck, rather than the confeck itself—probably no better for your long-term health!).
- —Felix the Cassowary (ɑe hɪː jɐ) 12:24, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
- "Sweet-toothed" ? -- Derek Ross | Talk 05:54, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Influence of Atitude
This artcle fails to mention the considerable effect of the altitude of the place where the cooking is done to the temperature corresponding to the various "stages". Are all people interested in candy ftlanders or lowlanders ?
[edit] Candi, Crete
Would this be important?
- The Arabs installed the first industrial sugar refinery on the island of Candia or Crete around the year 1000. The Arabic name for Crete, Qandi meant crystallized sugar.
- History of Food, Maguelonne Toussaint-Samat,Translated by Anthea Bell [Barnes & Noble Books:New York] 1992 (p. 549-554)
(unsigned comment ArthurianLegend on 2006-08-03T04:17:00)
- Alas, Toussaint-Samat is a really, really unreliable source, full of legends and misinformation, and since she doesn't footnote most of what she writes, there's no way of verifying it. (Take a look at the customer reviews at Amazon. In this case, there is one major error, one minor error, and another dubious claim. The Arabic name Khandaq quite clearly comes from the Arabic word for "moat" (they dug one around the city), and has nothing to do with Qandi or Candy. It is true that Crete was sometimes called Candy, short for Candia, but this is pure happenstance. The island and the capital were not called Candia under Ottoman rule (as the article used to say), but under Venetian rule (before the Ottomans). I don't know where she gets the idea that the Arabs "built a large sugar refinery". This may or may not be true, but I don't know of any evidence for it. ِAn article I found, "The Mediterranean Sugar Industry" (J. H. Galloway, Geographical Review 67:2:177-194 (Apr., 1977)[1]), shows sugar being produced in Crete from 1300-1600 (during the Venetian period), but shows only question marks for 800-1300. Upshot of all this, I have deleted this section of the article. Of course, if you have other sources for the Cretan sugar refinery claim, that would be great.... --Macrakis 20:31, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Vandlized
The page has been vadilized, and I can't seem to edit out the explicet content. If someone knows how, please edit out the profanities ect. Unforgotten 03:31, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- This is an encyclopedia, and it is good for our articles to be explicit, and we have no particular religious orientation, so don't worry about profanation much. On the other hand, the obscenities that some vandal has added have nothing to do with this article, so I have removed them. --Macrakis 20:38, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] lollypop
I can't speak for new zealand, but in australia, lollypop only refers to a lolly on a stick. --UnnamedGent 02:51, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
- I agree with UnnamedGent. This article should not say Austrlain's use the term lollypop for any candy -Waza 04:53, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Health aspects
I would like to see some aspects on the health by eating candy. For example:
- Is it dangerous to let your children eat candy? Perhaps to a certain extent?
- However, it is certain that candy has a bad effect on the teeth. Prokaryotes produce acids in the metabolism of sugars, and these acids breaks down enamel. The result is caries. The world deserves to know this.
[edit] Who invented candy?
I'm curious, Wikipedians. 69.245.103.98 00:43, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
