Talk:Cansei de Ser Sexy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of the Alternative music WikiProject, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage of articles relating to Alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. |
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the Project's importance scale. |
Contents |
[edit] Requested move
CSS (Cansei de Ser Sexy) → Cansei de Ser Sexy — According to Wikipedia Naming Conventions on music, band and album names, it seems the page should be moved. Unfortunately, there's already a Cansei de Ser Sexy page redirecting to their album — Talk:CSS (Cansei de Ser Sexy) — Rudá 18:15, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Survey
- Support - It would be better to follow the Wikipedia Naming Conventions.
Rudá 18:22, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
- Support. Kafziel 18:49, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
- Support, and change the album to Cansei de Ser Sexy (album). I don't think anyone will object. Daniel Trielli 04:49, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Requested move 2
Cansei de Ser Sexy → CSS (band) — "CSS" is the band's actual name: it is referred to as such by their label's site [1] and their own site [2]. Their album, on the other hand, is actually called "Cansei de Ser Sexy". Sdalmonte 09:30, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Translation
Isn't it "I tired..." or "I got tired..." rather than "I am tired..."? I'm pretty sure that would be "Estou Cansada de Ser Sexy" A Geek Tragedy 16:43, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] vandalism?
- The band is notorious for their emphasis on style, fashion and coolness (for 'coolness', see 'NME appeal' and ego), rather than musical ambitions.
Is that vandalism? --jeffrey elliot 19:47, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
- Nah, more likely an unsourced non-NPOV claim. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by HisSpaceResearch (talk • contribs) 21:27, 26 February 2007 (UTC).
[edit] Css Sort of has Neo-Nazi Trappings
Why does the cover to Cansei de Ser Sexy have a stylized C with fangs and something visually similar to Schutzstaffel runes? Difference between using one shock symbol a la Bowie or Manson, and imitating the SS. - MSTCrow 23:22, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Reading I bit too much into it there i think, regardless it is irrelevant as wikipedia has no control over the cover design Mbthegreat 23:01, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] 'LGBT studies'
I swear if i see this LGBT tag on another discussion page i will scream. WHat on earth do css have to do with lgbt issues i cant find any evidence they're lgbt and if they are then please mention it in the article.
LGBT wikiproject gives us gays a bad name, gives the impression we're trying to claim everything as our own placing our stupid tag on every other page lol. Aveit2007 09:41, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- I can find no evidence for LGBT in the article. It was tagged because it is in the category "LGBT musical groups". Unless there is a reason why, it should be removed. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 23:26, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
-
- Aveit2007, I'm curious about your reaction to the banner - could you explain a little?
- I'd like to point out that the presence of the banner in no way "lays claim to any article. It merely says the article is "within the scope of the project".
- And how in the world does putting a banner on the talk page of an article give us a bad name?
- As to this particular article, it was in the Category:LGBT musical groups. If that's incorrect, then the article itself has incorrect information that should be corrected.
- Thank you for taking the banner off an article that isn't within the scope of the project. I am still courious about your reaction, though, and welcome a response. -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 16:27, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
