Chan Nai-ming
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Chan Nai-Ming (Traditional Chinese: 陳乃明) is a Hong Kong citizen, believed to be the first person in the world to be convicted of a crime for using BitTorrent P2P file sharing. He is currently on bail waiting for the appeal.
Contents |
[edit] Alleged incident
Chan Nai-Ming was accused of uploading three Hollywood films (Daredevil, Miss Congeniality and Red Planet) onto the Internet using BitTorrent under the alias 古惑天皇, variously translated as “Master of Cunning” or “Big Crook”. Chan was 38 years old and unemployed.
[edit] Trial
He was charged with 3 counts of “attempting to distribute an infringing copy of a copyright work (otherwise than for the purpose of, in the course of, any trade or business) to such an extent as to affect prejudicially the owner of the copyright, without the licence of the copyright owner, contrary to sections 118(1)(f) and 119(1) of the Copyright Ordinance, Cap. 528 and section 159G of the Crimes Ordinance, Cap. 200” and 3 counts of an alternative charge of “Obtaining access to a computer with dishonest intent, contrary to section 161(1)(c) of the Crimes Ordinance, Cap. 200”. Since the first 3 charges were proven, the last 3 charges were dropped.
Chan was sentenced to three months in prison on 24 October 2005. The maximum penalty is four years in prison.
At the Tuen Mun Magistracy, Magistrate Colin Mackintosh said that he had reduced the term because this was Chan's first offence and the first sentencing for such a case in the world. However, the judge claimed that anyone else caught illegally sharing files in the wake of his judgment could expect tougher treatment.
[edit] Appeals
He was released on bail for HK$5000 while waiting for the results of the appeal to the High Court. On 12 December 2006, the High Court upheld the original verdict and sentence. He was jailed immediately.
The High Court denied him leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal, but he was bailed for HK$5000 on 3 January 2007 to seek leave for appeal at the CFA (leave can be granted by either the High Court or the CFA). On 7 February, the CFA granted him leave and set the trial date for 9 May 2007. The main point of his argument is what is the exact definition of "copies" and "distribution".
[edit] External links
- TMCC 1268/2005 HKSAR v CHAN NAI MING original judgment
- HCMA 1221/2005 HKSAR v CHAN NAI MING High Court appeal judgment
- FAMC 0061/2006 HKSAR v CHAN NAI MING CFA bail pending leave application
- FAMC 0061A/2006 HKSAR v CHAN NAI MING CFA bail pending appeal
[edit] Academic Opinion
- The Hong Kong BitTorrent Case (HKSAR v CHAN NAI MING): Will Big Crook Go Down Big Time for a Little Infringement? Stuart Weinstein & Charles Wild, Working Paper (abstract only), April 2007
- Big Crook in Little China: The Ramifications of the Hong Kong BitTorrent Case on the Criminal Test of Prejudicial Effect Michael Filby, Working Paper, February 2007
[edit] Journalistic Reports
- New York Times 8th November 2005
- BBC 7th November 2005