Talk:Chander P. Grover

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.

Biography Portal

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]

This article is part of WikiProject Canadian law, an attempt to co-ordinate articles on Canadian law, produce common standards and fill in the gaps. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page (see Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ for more information).

This article takes one side of a very controversial dispute between an employee and his employer. It seems to have been created by a family member of this employee with the only objective of publicizing the issue. It uses strong language such as "organized conspiracy", "human rights crusader", and a link to "White supremacism", which is clearly not a neutral point of view. This article should probably be deleted. 132.246.2.24 13:34, 7 September 2005 (UTC)

I cleaned up most of it. The white supremacism link was probably too much. I couldn't come up with a better word than activist for crusader. I can't judge the case since it might actually be defined as a "conpiracy". I would have to view the case report. I am going to assume good faith and leave that little part in there. Hopefully this now meets your standards. --Lord Voldemort ^{(Dark Mark)} 18:03, 7 September 2005 (UTC)

"Organized conspiracy" is the term used in articles on Grover v. NRC (Montreal Gazette, Ottawa Citizen). Also note that "human rights crusader" is common parlance and not "strong language". While 132.246.2.24 claims that "one side of a controversial dispute" is being discussed, I hold that the article is factual and substantiated by references including an order under the Federal Court of Canada. NPOV is maintained. 132.246.2.24 is also the IP address from the National Research Council of Canada and there was also a PSRLB decision on Oct 4, 2005 substantiating this article. -- Samir (the scope) 17:48 14 September 2005 (UTC).

Should there be an article on racial discrimination in the Canadian Public Service? Seems to me as this was a very important media topic (Shiv Chopra/whistleblowers was clouded in confirmed allegations of racial discrimination). -- Barry Zuckerkorn 19:39, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Currently working on a Shiv Chopra article. --Deenoe 00:48, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ignore All rules

In case, more trollish contents are edited, I shall protect the page Ignoring All Rules to protect the integrity of the project. Persons indulging in trollish behaviuor shall be blocked. Please refrain from direct or indirect personal attacks and please do not turn the page into an attack page. --Bhadani 16:28, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Trolls shall be killed! as and when spotted for which Ignore All Rules have been framed. Please treat this as a final warning - any troll I wiil spot shall meet death, that is, block. --Bhadani 19:59, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Now foolish troll should report me for death threats - foolish trolls are more dangerous than intelligent trolls. --Bhadani 19:59, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Thank you Mr. Troll. However, inflammatory words do not make me angry :) Edits like the one you have done are like Taj Mahal of wikipedia (in your opinion, I presume!) --Bhadani 18:07, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

This article qualifies under WP:PROF. — Nearly Headless Nick 14:58, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] "Human rights activist"

Suing one's employer on one's own behalf does not make one a "human rights activist"--it makes one a "plaintiff."-Cindery 18:54, 31 January 2007 (UTC)