Talk:Church (Red vs. Blue)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is part of WikiProject Films, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to films and film characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. Unknown This article has not been rated on the importance assessment scale.
Editing Guidelines Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article: If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film) For more information see: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films) When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot summary of no more than 900 words, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references. Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Machinima, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to machinima on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the main project page and join or contribute to the discussion.
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale. [FAQ]
Low	This article has been rated as being of Low importance within machinima on the importance scale.
This article has been rated for quality and/or importance, but no comments have yet been left.

Church (Red vs. Blue) is a current good article nominee. If you have not contributed significantly to this article, feel free to evaluate it according to the good article criteria and then pass or fail the article as outlined on the candidates page. Nomination date: 2007-03-27

Contents 1 GFDL notice 2 Move proposal 3 Tubby? 4 Times as a ghost 5 Good article nomination, maybe

[edit] GFDL notice

On 20:24, July 7, 2006 (UTC), this was split from List of main characters in Red vs Blue#Church. Prior edit history can be found in the edit history of that article. — TKD::Talk 01:32, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Move proposal

Please see Talk:Red vs Blue#Requested move for discussion. — TKD::Talk 17:27, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tubby?

In episode 82 and 85 Caboose and Tucker tease Church about snaking a lot, curiusly, Burnie Burns (voice of Chruch) has been accused of doing the same, dosent that count as trivia?[[1]]. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 201.211.157.123 (talk • contribs).

Well, it's not only trivia (which should actually be avoid), it's also original research, because there's no firm evidence that Rooster Teeth meant to make that parallel, or that a reliable source noticed it. — TKD::Talk 03:00, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Times as a ghost

Here's why I don't think the list of appearances as a ghost is useful:

• Some of the appearances are trivial and brief — for example, the latest one.
• Where it's important to the plot, it's already mentioned elsewhere, so as to give context. If you can cite a source that the appearance is significant for production reasons, mention it in the Filming section.
• Thus, items on a separate list is either trivial or redundant.
• To list these appearances separately is to imply that they are more important than the times in which he appears in armor, which isn't necessarily true. It's not a causal relationship.

I'm removing the section again; let's discuss this further before adding a list that seems to have limited benefit and exaggerates the notability of some appearances. — TKD::Talk 11:19, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Good article nomination, maybe

hey has anyone thought of nominating this artile for good article, it's getting pretty close to the Donut quality, and it's looking pretty good. Also the worst that can happen is we get some insight on what to fix/improve. Any thoughts????

peace-Threewaysround 00:28, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

any thoughts at all anyone?!?!?-Threewaysround 20:10, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Uhm...I concur? Dac 01:05, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

awesome, i'll wait for a few more days to see if anyone else wants to speak, then i'll nominate.-Threewaysround 14:33, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

it's done-Threewaysround 20:26, 27 March 2007 (UTC)