Talk:Cinderella Castle
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on Disney on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
 |
This article covers subjects of relevance to Architecture. To participate, visit the Wikipedia:WikiProject Architecture for more information. The current monthly improvement drive is Castle. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. |
| Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the assessment scale. |
The bit about the castle at night - saying it is lit with 16 million colours doesn't sound right. is this just bad grammar? Hellfire83 23:42, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Hidden Apartment?
How could the apartment be left unfinished upon Walt's death in 1966 if the castle didn't even exist yet? I'm not sure of the actual construction dates of the castle, but I know there was nothing there in 1966. --Lyght 08:21, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
- I think the space was intended for Disney VIPs, not Walt. It likely was an idea abandoned when Roy O. Disney died barely two months after Walt Disney World opened in 1971. —Whoville 22:20, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
- Good point, I heard this on the Travel Channel, too, and remember thinking that this was impossible. Maybe they had plans for it before Walt's death, and decided to keep it there out of classic Disney symbolism when they began to construct the area in which it was to be built. Who knows. ---WBHoenig 20:03, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Copyright question - Disney press release in section on hidden apartment
An anonymous / non-logged in user has pasted in text from a disney press release describing the hidden apartment - I've cleaned the formatting up a bit but I am unsure of the rules with copyright for this sort of thing. presumably, as a press release, it's freely reproducable, but also presumably should be correctly referenced and cited? Rmkf1982 | Talk 12:44, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
