User talk:Citylightsgirl
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Your edits to Neil Clark (journalist)
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Citylightsgirl! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but please note that the link you added in is on my spam blacklist and should not be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an Imageshack or Photobucket image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was genuine spam, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 20:13, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Edit war on the Neil Clark page
On the administrtor's noticeboard you have been directed to the Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard where I have taken the liberty of reporting the dispute and acknowledging my own involvement, as you will see. Philip Cross 20:22, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] March 2007
Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Neil Clark (journalist). Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - Denny 08:15, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] 3RR violation
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Your last edit to Oliver Kamm, being the 4th revert on less than 24 hours, violates 3RR. Please self revert it, or you will be reported and blocked.
[edit] User notice: temporary 3RR block
[edit] Regarding reversions[1] made on March 8, 2007 to Oliver Kamm
[edit] Your edits to Neil Clark
Hi Citylights, could you note, please, that editors are strongly discouraged from editing any topic, particularly biographies of living persons, with which they could be said to stand in a conflict of interest? It seems to me that your edits may indeed fit that description. It would be appreciated if you could stand back and allow uninvolved editors decide how best to proceed with the entry. Many thanks, SlimVirgin (talk) 00:37, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
- If you continue to edit that article, you risk being blocked from editing as you appear to be in a clear conflict of interest. Please limit your participation to the talk page, where your suggestions will be welcomed. SlimVirgin (talk) 10:16, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Warning: Vandalism on Neil Clark. using TW
[edit] March 2007
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Neil Clark, you will be blocked from editing.
If you disagree with the content on a page, please visit its talk page, please do not change the disambiguation page. -- Whereizben - Chat with me 15:42, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Final warning: Vandalism on Neil Clark. using TW
[edit] March 2007
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Neil Clark, you will be blocked from editing. -- Whereizben - Chat with me 16:45, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
