Talk:Comte de Lautréamont

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	France Portal Comte de Lautréamont is within the scope of WikiProject France, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to France and Monaco on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.

	Uruguay Portal This article is part of WikiProject Uruguay, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Uruguay If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of objectives.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]

Not sure of usual article placement, should this be under his real name Isidore Ducasse or under his better known pseudonym? Greg Godwin

It's usual to put the article under the name a person is best known by - in this case the pseudonym. However, it's normally best to make a redirect from their real name in case somebody links to that in the future - I've just made such a redirect here: Isidore Ducasse. --Camembert

Slipped my mind completely, cheers Cam! Greg Godwin

I'm afraid that the latest series of additions to this page, while clearly meant in good faith, repeat key information and fail to do so in a way that adheres to the rules of English grammar. In addition, most of the new material is unsourced and the objective view-point has disappeared. Dec. 15th, 2006.

Not at all. It carries much more information now. If improvement in Grammar is needed - please do so! --Phillippp 01:57, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Once again, assuming the good faith of the previous poster as well as those who have "cleaned up" this page, I wish to present reasons for a real consideration of a reversion of the recent edits to this page. Though the previous poster claims "more information" has been added, it is a)redundant information, and, (b) information that has been added in an "essay manner"--i.e. full of loaded language, that effectively destroys the neutral point of view of this article. With these points in mind, I suggest a total reversion to the point just previous to the previous poster's additions to this page. By doing this we will be effectively returning to a neutral point of view. We can then begin to work from there. Suggestions (given in good faith) are welcome. Jesse Glass

Agree with Jesse. Lautreamont is important enough to art/literary history to warrant a major article, but this thing is almost citation-free. Lexo 19:07, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Great! Let's wait for a few more opinions and then begin. Jeses Glass 19: 40, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

There are some factual as well as myriad grammatical/syntactical errors on this page that should be cleaned up. I am glad to lend a hand. Tim —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nouche (talk • contribs) 16:36, 22 February 2007 (UTC).