Talk:Constance Cumbey
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Stuff moved
The material that was here has been moved to Talk:Javier Solana. David Cannon 10:34, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
On April 16, 2005 this page was nominated for deletion. The result of the debate was to keep. See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Constance E. Cumbey for discussion. Mackensen (talk) 15:25, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- I think the article should be called Constance Cumbey which is a redirect so would need an admin to do it. What do others think? --SqueakBox 19:11, May 7, 2005 (UTC)
I have reverted the removal of Cumbey's published works, which I consider to be unjustified. Articles about authors frequently list their works. BTW, I agree that the article should be redirected to remove the middle initial. I'll do it now. David Cannon 00:50, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
In your revert you attempted to humiliate me by giving my contribs in your edit summary. I have removed the duplication of Cumbey's works as unnecessary and the speculation about a new book and about her being User:Cumbey as unsourced and therefore unencyclopedic. Davidcannon falsely accused me of being Cumbey's sockpuppet, for which he apologised to me but not to Cumbey, --SqueakBox 16:37, May 18, 2005 (UTC)
Good god, we're voting to keep conspiracy tards' vanity pages now? --Sparks Light
- SparksLight, if you are a coincidence theorist, you, my friend, are the tard.
[edit] Programming
To the subject of the article: no offence, but you sound like you could use a major deprogramming. This is all End Times programming triggering and will aid the New World Order rather than hurt it.
Leave her a message at http://cumbey.blogspot.com/ SqueakBox 18:15, July 29, 2005 (UTC)