User:Constantzeanu

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Userboxes Wikipedia:Babel ro Acest utilizator este un vorbitor nativ al limbii române. en-ca This user is a native speaker of Canadian English. de-2 Dieser Benutzer hat fortgeschrittene Deutschkenntnisse. fr-2 Cet utilisateur peut contribuer avec un niveau intermédiaire en français. it-1 Questo utente può contribuire con un livello semplice di italiano. Cyrl-4 я This user has a near complete understanding of the Cyrillic alphabet. ru-0 Этот участник не понимает по-русски (или понимает с большим трудом). Search user languages This user supports the reunification of Romania and Moldova within the present borders of both states. This user's Canada includes Québec. This user supports the New Democratic Party. This user sees the Taba Summit as a blueprint on reaching a two-state solution in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. This user believes that George W. Bush's edits to the constitution need to be reverted. Although not completely rejecting it, this user is skeptical of the EU, its aims and its policies. This user identifies himself as a Left-Libertarian thinker.

• What interests me on Wikipedia is articles related to history and politics.

• Primarily this is the sort of articles I have contributed to as well.

Articles started by me or that I have extensively contributed to are:

Geography

• Sacalin Island
• Milcov River
• Dobrogea

Bukovinian Politicians

• Iancu Flondor
• Aurel Onciul

Canadian Politicians on Montreal Island

• Adrian Micu

Political Parties

• MURM

Political Scientists

• Herbert Kitschelt

Bukovinian Geography

• Crasna
• Voloca
• Novoselytskyi Raion
• Storozhynetskyi Raion
• Tatarbunary Uprising

Prehistory

• PPNA Wall of Jericho
• Proto-city

Extensive Contributions to:

• Romanian Army
• Romanian Land Forces

[edit] Political Views

• Politically I consider myself a liberal while economically slightly on the left, but not quite yet a socialist. According to Herbert Kitschelt’s breakdown of the modern post 1980 political spectrum I would qualify somewhat as a left-libertarian oriented individual.

[edit] Views Concerning Wikipedia

• Wikipedia is great because of two things: #1) you can access information really fast and #2) you can expect that the second time you will use it for research, it is very likely that the amount of information will increase.

• The increase in information is, at least in theory, supposed to happen through a process of NPOV contributions, mitigated by helpful sysops and admins. Although this is true of most cases, a problem that Wikipedia has not fully addressed, so far, is sysops that abuse their power in order to push their own POV. That is to say, sysops who forget what their job really is and who engage in wars with the ordinary user who is simply trying to add his/her own contribution.