Talk:Crown Prince Party

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] I found it was identical to the text in [1].

Do I have the right to propose a deletion voting and how can I do this? Xiaojeng 05:17, 29 September 2005 (UTC)

I removed alot of the editorialising (eg. "it is fair to say many of them are arrogant and domineering", i switched it to "many of them are perceived to be arrogant and undeserving of the fortune or prominence they holding").

"As a party governed by collective dictatorship, Chinese Communist Party would not advocate free election and speech. Those senor leaders think they have made contributions to the establishment of this government, thus it is legal for them and their families to enjoy the fruit of governance without any saying. Furthermore, it is naturally for them to pick up their own children to succeed this kingdom , so as to make sure it wouldn’t be overthrown by peace transition launched by western countries. As a result, the "Crown Princes" are often having important offices or big fortunes much faster and more convenient than other ordinary people or cadres, regardless of their possible incompetence ."

That whole paragraph is just an editorial, doesn't belong here.

"Furthermore, with the quest for democracy and liberty being insurmountable, CCP leaders still strongly resist this historic trend and would like their own children or relatives to succeed their reign so as to keep the life of totalitarianism forever young."

Editorial.

"It is without any doubt as CCP governance goes on for another day, the Crown Prince Party will go on for another day too"

Editorial.

I still think this whole article is just crap. Alot of it just reads just like a editorial. I think the photos and the names and the first paragraph is NPOV. The rest are just opinions written with bad spelling and english.

210.84.37.134 12:19, 19 December 2005 (UTC)