Talk:Current 93

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ] (If you rated the article, please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed biographical guide to musicians and musical groups on Wikipedia.

It is requested that a photograph or photographs be included in this article to improve its quality.

Someone clean this up, because I'm not... Sinewaves23 21:37, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] James Joyce's influence

From David Tibet's interview with Pitchfork Media on Spet. 11, 2006:

David Tibet: Have you ever read Finnegans Wake?

Pitchfork: Yes, though I've read it in parts-- I'll read 25 pages and then put it down and pick it up later and read 25 more....

DT: That's what I did. I really love the idea of it, but I just think it's absolutely unreadable...just seems such a waste really. I like space. I like linear simple things with lots of spaces, so then I feel like I can breathe. I feel very claustrophobic when I'm surrounded by anything that is taking up all the space, maybe that's eating all the sky.

I really admire James Joyce as a person, though to be honest, I've never found his work as interesting as I'd hoped it would be. Same with Ulysses. I just found it very difficult and boring….

Seeing as Tibet calls Finnegans Wake "absolutely unreadable" and "such a waste," and that he's "never found [Joyce's] work as interesting as [he'd] hoped," I've removed Joyce and Finnegans Wake from the list of literary influences. -- Rynne 21:18, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Photo

Can someone please post a good photo rather than the one shown at the moment? It looks like someone tried to enlarge a small photo and it looks very rough/ugly as a result. --Demonslave 15:56, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] New category - a question

I'm currently (heh) populating a new category - British experimental musicians. I'm including soloists obviously, and also bands with just one constant member, like NWW. My question is: should I include Current 93? It seems a bit borderline between band and soloist. Totnesmartin 14:43, 12 February 2007 (UTC)