Talk:Dallas Mavericks
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I wrote the team's history all the way up until 1994, but I'm gonna go to bed now, and I'll be out of town for a few days. I'll be more than happy to finish the job upon my return, unless someone else wants to take over, of course. ekedolphin 07:11, Jan 3, 2005 (UTC)
I may give it a go this weekend --Cronosquall 07:31, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
Eduardo Najera was a great entergetic force for a couple of years, yet, as a Mavericks fan, I wouldn't consider him a not-to-be-forgotten. User:Mmmmhhhhmmm 10:51, 4 February 2006
i thought that podkolzine was sent to the d-league, wasn't he?
Contents |
[edit] What's in the team logo?
- I thought Mavericks means young calves (cows/bulls), but that logo looks like a horse to me, anyone can explain the lineage? Thanks. Kenimaru 22:41, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
The creature that you see in the logo is a horse with the letter "M" stamped on its forehead. I do not think that the team name is derived from the definition that you mention; rather it (in my belief) refers to this one: An unorthodox or independent-minded person; a person who refuses to conform to the views of a particular group or party; an individualist. (credit OED) Also, the team logo's previous incarnation was a mere cowboy hat perched upon the letter "M"(you could easilly find an image through a google search) so the cow/bull imagery that you suggest was never present.--Schadenfreude52 22:01, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
-
- Now you mentioned it, I do recall that old logo, thanks. Kenimaru 06:53, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- I like the cowboy hat. They need to modernize it and bring it back. WizardDuck 22:14, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- Is it bizarre to anyone else that the horse seems to look a lot like Mark Cuban? At least the hair? He is one self absorbed dude, even if he is a great owner.--CSTV 15:43, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
-
Mark Cuban should not be placed under "Not to be Forgotten." He is still the owner. I'm going to take him off of that list. --Schadenfreude52 20:06, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Hey, isn't Devin Harris still a part of the Mavericks current roster? And Pavel Nedved (if that's what his last name is?) 20:50, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] History
I have taken the time to merge the information from History of the Dallas Mavericks to Dallas Mavericks. I felt that there was no need to have two pages when one would do perfectly fine. Please take time to look over the changes and possible complications that may occur. Thanks for your time. --Schadenfreude52 22:03, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
It would be nice, if we could have people to begin writing out the history for this season. I'll be sure to add in the coming days. --Schadenfreude52 05:45, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] NBA Finals 2006
I just added this section to the entry. I hope to have more information added here within the coming days. --Schadenfreude52 03:35, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
I added a little more info. Let's look to get a NBA Finals schedule in there. Cheesehead Fan 04:06, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
Ok, I got the schedule, and now we need to get more info about the Mavs playoff run in 06. Cheesehead Fan 04:09, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
A schedule is inappropriate for an encyclopedia and I will be deleting it tomorrow. It should not be there, it should a telling of the facts and story of their run through the 2006 playoffs, not the current events schedule. --Mystalic 06:38, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
Leave the schedule! Someone actually use it, its not bothering you!
It's not part of a proper encyclopedia. --Mystalic 23:55, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
If you could, let's discuss it a little more Cheesehead Fan 03:14, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Perhaps the schedule can be replaced with game recaps? GO MAVS!!! hehehehe --Howard the Duck 15:17, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
For now, I vote that we keep the schedule; it could be helpful later on in our documentation of the Mavs' entire playoff run. However, once the finals are over, I agree that there is no point to having the schedule and that its presence will weaken the page's "credibility" as an encyclopedia entry. --Schadenfreude52 20:00, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
I agree, that was the purpose of me putting it(ima loser) on. Cheesehead Fan 01:59, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
Someone keeps changing the statement "Mavericks officials and fans have cited poor officiating and phantom calls as secondary contributors to their loss to the Heat, especially concerning Game 5" to "NBA officials and fans have cited poor officiating and phantom calls as secondary contributors to their loss to the Heat, especially concerning Game 5". This is a patently false statement; NBA officials have made no such pronouncement. Either provide a corroborating cite or quit screwing around. 68.94.233.24 15:24, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
The citation at the end of the sentence was not made by anyone associated with the Mavericks.
[edit] Removal of the Finals Schedule/Results
Since the finals are over, I propose that the schedule be removed as was the consensus above. The information could possibly be worked into the section if we think it is relevant. Thisischris 17:22, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
since there was no other opinions, I went ahead and removed the schedule. Thisischris 12:40, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] 1st victory at Boston
Is it true that the Mavs' first victory in Boston occurred in the '96 season? If so, please have that mentioned because I remember it being such a jinx for them. Heck, even the Nuggets were able to win in Boston in the '88 season that saw them and the Mavs battling in the postseason. The Nuggets franchise can't feel so bad about that season. :-) -Amit
[edit] "Present" section renamed
Since the "Present" section mentioned events that happened in '04-05 and '05-06, I changed the name to something like "Big roster changes help lead team to Finals". I'm not completely happy with that title but at least it's more accurate... if anyone has a better one, please don't hesitate to edit it. ekedolphin 11:20, 5 March 2007 (UTC)