Talk:Daniel Rodriguez/Comments
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Well-referenced. It seems a nice work. I can go further than B, because the article has not yet gone through a GAC review. Now, I cannot go into details here about the deficiencies of the article. Definitely, the prose could be less choppy in some cases, and the flow could be further improved. But for further feedback, I think a peer-review is the best solution.--Yannismarou 18:32, 10 January 2007 (UTC) Oh! I now saw you also submitted the article for a peer-review as well! Fine!--Yannismarou 18:35, 10 January 2007 (UTC)