Talk:Dannielynn Stern paternity case

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Law Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field.
???	This article has not yet received a quality rating on the assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received an importance assessment on the assessment scale.

This article was nominated for deletion on February 26, 2007. The result of the discussion was KEEP (but rename from "Dannielynn Marshall Stern" to "Dannielynn Marshall Stern paternity case").

haha OK so it can be a page about a child of anna nicole but not the mother Virgie Arthur that isotope deleted??what is this child more then the child of anna nicole+????? i request that her article be restored.--Matrix17 14:58, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

If you wish to contest the deletion of an article, you can do so at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Aecis^Brievenbus 15:46, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

I ask the question again? what is Dannielynn more then anna nicoles child? and why was virgie arthur deleted,just because she was only her mother. well dannielynn is only anna nicoles child,right? doublestandard when it comes to some article decisions. its more about who writes it then the actuall article.--Matrix17 10:15, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

It has nothing to do with who wrote the article. Virgie Arthur did not meet WP:BIO in any way. Dannielynn does as a matter of technicality, though I don't see much of a reason for a standalone article here. At best this should be a redirect. Still, it is a bit premature to do anything here right now because the case is still ongoing. When the dust settles, then it would be a good time to discuss what should be done here.--Isotope23 14:05, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Dannielynn Marshall Stern is at the centre of a notable dispute, the involvement of Virgie Arthur is peripheral. If you disagree with this, you may nominate this article for deletion. If you disagree with the deletion of the article on Virgie Arthur, you may request a deletion review. Aecis^Brievenbus 10:25, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

I did put it up for deletion but someone took it off without even asking as usuall on this page.--Matrix17 11:48, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

removing PROD's doesn't require any comment on the part of the person removing it. PROD is different than a speedy delete or AfD in that way. You can always nominate the article for WP:AFD if you disagree with the deprod.--Isotope23 14:02, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

I have nominated the article for deletion as a contested prod: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dannielynn Marshall Stern. Aecis^Brievenbus 14:41, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

this article should be deleted or merged with anna nicole, i mean c'mon people. Mcoop06 15:56, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

I disagree. Perhaps in the long run it should be deleted, but this article and the article about Virgie Arthur should remain as long they are part of a high profile, ongoing news story. --JHP 06:13, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Contents 1 No delete 2 Delete 3 Was She Really Born Hannibel? 4 Inheritance 5 No longer a biography 6 Surname

[edit] No delete

The custody battle of Dannielynn is unique in its circumstances. I imagine the ongoing case will eventually serve as citations for future legal arguments and it is important to have a comprehensive article about her for reference. As stated before Dannielynn does meet criteria of WP:BIO and while she has not directly done anything more than any other infant can do she indirectly has had a huge global impact. For example, on google news there are currently (at time of my post) 14,399 articles available referencing her name. I say no delete. Joneboi 10:51, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Delete

My only opinion is if virgie arthur got deleted this should also get deleted or both articles get restored.Dannielynn is not more notable then virgie,in one way less notable.i totally agrees with isotope23 in hes opinion earlier here´,but now i think its time for deletion.--Matrix17 08:56, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Was She Really Born Hannibel?

I thought her birth name was Dannielynn. Is Dannielynn her "media" name or real one?

Baby16 20:15, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Inheritance

I think there should be something indicating Dannielynn is potentially very rich, and that this a supposed reason for perhaps some of the paternity claims. However, I don't really know how to word it in such a way as to avoid legal problems. Can anyone help? --A bit iffy 15:00, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] No longer a biography

Since this is no longer a biography, it is really a case or article, I removed the bio tag. --Maniwar (talk) 20:56, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Surname

I am under the impression that Marshall is another middle name, rather than a surname. Shouldn't this article be titled Dannielynn Stern paternity case? Charles 04:43, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

I confirmed that Marshall is only another middle name for Dannielynn. I am moving the page. Charles 04:43, 23 March 2007 (UTC)