From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| 19,000+ |
This user has over 19,000 edits |
vanity |
This user supports the removal of Vanity pages with extreme prejudice. |
 |
This user remembers how to use a typewriter, and that's all you need to know. |
 |
This user is a member of WikiProject Rivers. |
 |
This user prefers cold weather. |
|
|
This user is interested in maps. |
|
(Born March 10, 1968, in Englewood, New Jersey,USA) Daniel Case lives in the Hudson Valley region of upstate New York with his wife and son. Previously, they have lived in the Greater Cleveland area and Western New York. He received a bachelor's degree in English and geography from Syracuse University in 1990, and a master's degree in English from the State University of New York at Buffalo in 1997.
After having gradually discovered Wikipedia and its possibilities late in 2004, he began editing articles, particularly those devoted to the Catskill Mountains, which he has come to love while hiking extensively and having served on the board of the Catskill Mountain 3500 Club, and which he found to be deeply in need of extension and revision.
[edit] Barnstars
 |
|
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar |
| For simultaneously upholding WP:NOT and WP:BITE. Joe 05:48, 22 April 2006 (UTC) |
 |
|
The Photographer's Barnstar |
| For putting forth the time and effort to take great pictures and improve countless articles on New York towns, roads, and landmarks, I award you the Photographer's Barnstar. Kafziel 13:41, 22 June 2006 (UTC) |
[edit] Deletion
If you've come here because my name was on the history as having listed on AFD, or putting a speedy-deletion notice, an article you created or want to keep, go here
[edit] Milestones
- My 5000th edit. First milestone I've really gotten to notice in time celebrate. Who could have imagine it would have been something so minor as adding the FA star to any article I otherwise had nothing to do with?
- 7000th edit. I thought it would come from the highways project, but it was a little interlude on a train station that did the trick this time.
- 8000th edit. Took some time to find this due to problems with the tool. A message to another user about an edit he made to a Catskill article.
- 10,000th edit The biggie: Five figures. This was actually something substantive, the addition of a further reading section (i.e., works I came across while researching the subject that I could not physically or virtually get a hold of, so I'm putting them here so the work doesn't go to waste) to an article about a Supreme Court case.
- 11,000th edit A talk page message to someone else ... first time I've made note of an editing milestone in the edit itself.
[edit] Stories behind some of the articles
[edit] The Catskills and Hiking
Explained above. I created Category:Catskills and created or added in significant part to almost all of them. And there's a lot more to come. Sometime.
Hiking, too, is another area still not covered very well here. This led to creating Category:Hiking equipment and Category:Hiking organizations, taking the photo of hiking boots. I have worked on, and created, a bit in both. I would start a WikiProject:Hiking for this but I really don't have time, and I tend to range all over the place, anyway. (For one thing, a trail construction and maintenance article could be split from trail, and trail blazing (which I expanded and added a lot of images to, could really do with not only a cleanup (it looks like someone dropped their photos all over it) but perhaps a renaming and expansion to include signage as well.
Trails is probably the best thing we've got going. Check out the project page, which has been established since I first wrote that there wasn't a project. (I like that it uses a picture I took in the userbox)
. Probably we'll have to really get far along on WikiProject:Mountains first, though (and speaking of which, I've done and continue to do most of the work on Slide Mountain, which I hope to take to peer review and FA someday.
I'm very proud of Long Path, a creation of mine that is probably the most thorough of any hiking trail article on Wikipedia.
As I mentioned on the article's talk page, color me sacrilegious but I finally started drinking soda thanks to New Coke. It still seems, in hindsight, like the perfect medium between the tastes of Pepsi and Coke. I would love just one more can of Coke II.
So I looked this one up in summer 2005, and found it a disparate collection of facts. One of the external links tells the whole story of how Coke made its decision (which you can really understand) and I decided to rewrite the article to tell that story.
That storytelling, which has since been, as I knew it would be, edited down, got a lot of praise, which pleasantly surprised me. Its structure is still intact in the final article, even if the narrative twists have been hammered out. The article got linked from the Main Page on the anniversary of Classic Coke's reintroduction, perhaps because of the work I'd done on it in the weeks before, and still seems to draw a lot of interest (which means vandalism, too ... of all the articles I've put my stamp on, it gets the most).
On September 7, 2006, all the work I've put into it was rewarded when it received good article status. I hope eventually to improve it further, take it to peer review and then FA.
[edit] The Devil Wears Prada
In early 2005, a friend of ours shipped us some books she'd finished with and thought we might be interested in. The only one that struck me that way was The Devil Wears Prada, since I have a bit of a soft spot for popular chick lit, gender notwithstanding. I read it in three days and, still a few months new to Wikipedia, decided immediately to write an article about it.
What emerged, and is still there, reflects that era of Wikipedia and my tendencies as an editor at the time. I borrowed the template that I had sort of created for myself when doing The Lovely Bones a couple of months before. Like that one, it's a fascinating and comprehensive look at the book, but with an overly long plot summary and some critical commentary that borders on (and probably is) original research. At that time we weren't clear about how that applied to articles about literary works; today we wouldn't have it. Eventually I'll sit down and bring it in line with the novels project standards.
Later that year the film version was shot; by early 2006 it was clear that there was enough out there about it to warrant a separate article. I created it, added whatever information was available prerelease and then, when the film came out, saw it and wrote pretty much the entire beginnings of the "differences" section later that night. I also added the reviews and, most importantly, references that same night. Later I rented and watched the extras on the DVD. I probably know more about the novel than anyone except Lauren Weisberger and more about the film than anybody except the people who made it.
That last decision has made it so much easier to upgrade the article into what it is now, my other current favorite for future featured status. It would have been so much harder if I had written it and then gone back in to put in references (as I did with New Coke and some other articles). The new emphasis on references and citations may be a pain for older articles but, with those started under that system, it is much easier to build it up to a good quality.
It also became necessary to create an article on the soundtrack album in the process, and (while I have nothing to really do with it), someone else did an article on the forthcoming TV show. Could a video game be next?
