User talk:Daniel.Bryant/Archive/26
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
User | Talk | Contribs | Archives | Awards | Accounts | Australia | Time
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Although most correspondence should, and does, take place on my user talk page, there are situations where it may not be appropriate, or it is better to play it safe and have the conversation privately for whatever reason; use common sense. This is particularly important when dealing with OTRS issues, or in some cases, mediation issues. There are various ways to contact me privately. These include:-
|
I have formatted my talk page archives in groups of 30. If you wish to revisit an archived discussion, please make sure you post a link to the archive which holds the archived discussion when adding a new message to my user talk page, or else I won't know what previous discussion you are referring to. The main directory for my archive pages is located here. This page contains links to the archives, as well as the history of those archives. It also has a column which details the time span for that archive; if you need to find a previous discussion, identifying the date the discussion was held on and using that column will be the most beneficial option. A quarterly breakdown of Archives is listed below. For the purpose of this list, Archive 1 (which began on March 11, 2006) will be included in the third quarter (July–September), as it is the only one in the second quarter of 2006. Third quarter, 2006 (July–September) Fourth quarter, 2006 (October-December) First quarter, 2007 (January–March) Second quarter, 2007 (April–June) In addition, I have a number of "special" archives for various things. Please see the bottom of the main archive directory for details. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Clouds Blur the Rainbow on DYK for 25 Feb 2007Thank you for the nomination! — ERcheck (talk) 05:51, 25 February 2007 (UTC)Editing =/= reading and reviewing.Perhaps you have no reason to believe that I am familiar with many of wikipedia's policies and that is fine. I just wanted to point out that one can review what is going on without making personal contributions. I see nothing but complaints on the discussion pages about how few people there are to help out around here. And if I am not familiar with a particular topic.... I dont have to actually take the particular discussion. And I believe the best way to learn is to immerse yourself in the subject at hand. But oh well, wikipedia's loss for now. DanielZimmerman 08:32, 25 February 2007 (UTC) ThanksJust a quick message to say thank you very much for for extremely polite reply to my application for VP. And happy birthday 1 day in advance! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by -jmac- (talk • contribs) 19:09, 26 February 2007 (UTC).
VandalProof declineThat's okay, I wasn't really counting on approval. The problem is that I don't really know much useful information that isn't already in Wikipedia, and lately my only contributions to mainspace are reverts. How can I become a little more useful on Wikipedia even though I do not contribute much information? Jordan Elder talk 19:11, 26 February 2007 (UTC) P.S. Happy birthday.
Happy Birthday!>Kamope< Talk · Sign Here 00:04, 27 February 2007 (UTC)Whatever you wish for on your special day, May each of your wishes come true Cheers! PeaceNT 05:40, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
The Hidden Link BarnstarI hereby award you, Daniel Bryant, the Hidden Link Barnstar for finding the page that does not exist (you know the one I'm talking about).
P.S. Sorry about changing your front page. selfworm - just downgraded to version 0.4B! 00:20, 27 February 2007 (UTC) P.P.S. Happy Birthday! selfworm - just downgraded to version 0.4B! 01:49, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Happy Birthday!Good morning (GMT time); Kind regards,
Leo J. Ryan Federal BuildingWhat do you think of this newly-created article? Does it look ready for suggestion at Template talk:Did you know? I am still new to the whole WP:DYK procedures. Thank you for your time. Smee 05:31, 27 February 2007 (UTC).
Thank You for the UploadThank you for liking my A-League Grand Final photo to the point of uploading it and using it, I'm flattered! Mikhael04 06:40, February 27, 2007 (UTC)
Happy birthday, mate!Hope it's going well :) – riana_dzasta 06:49, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Have a great day Daniel. Kind regards, Extranet (Talk | Contribs) 10:10, 27 February 2007 (UTC) Happy Birthday! -Mschel 14:23, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for February 26th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:12, 27 February 2007 (UTC) Happy Birthday!Happy Wiki Birthday! --> •Tbone55•(Talk) (Contribs) (UBX) (autographbook) 16:59, 27 February 2007 (UTC) Oh, and Happy Wiki Birthday :) --Durin 17:14, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
A discussion you may be interested inYou might be interested in this discussion Wikipedia:Community_noticeboard#Clerks_of_all_types_need_to_be_deprecated --Durin 17:14, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
DYK--Yomanganitalk 22:25, 27 February 2007 (UTC)An awardI've gone and found a barnstar lying under a pile of socks you blocked and thought that you might like to have it. I don't blame you for being angry but I hope that you can overcome others' short-sightedness and find value in staying here. Best wishes, Mackensen (talk) 00:31, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Do listen, DanielGood evening (GMT time); Daniel - what is happening here? I had you down as the mature Wikipedian, not one that lies down to others. You can do no good away from the screen for a place that can only contacted in front of your computer. Please return - your one of our newest admins, passing with 100% support - and I think it is clear we need you! In the meanwhile, I can leave only one final quote: "...what is this fresh hell?..." Kind regards,
Your userpageDaniel, please e-mail me. What the heck is going on? Newyorkbrad 00:53, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Hey, I hope you're just blowing off a little steam but basically all right. Tempers have been running hot lately all of the place--I'm not sure why. I'll say to you the same thing I said to Essjay--I would urge you to continue doing the great work you do as always and ignore the pettiness, but I also understand if you'd rather stay away for a bit. In any case, let me know, here or by e-mail, if there's anything I can do. Chick Bowen 03:38, 28 February 2007 (UTC) Hey, I hope this is just temporary. We all understand if you want to stay away for a bit to cool off. Take care, and I hope whatever's gone wrong manages to resolve itself. E-mail's open. Cheers, – riana_dzasta 03:43, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
I'll take a different view and say that this is somewhat childish. Policy discussions, uproars, even trolling, happen all the time. If people who we rely on for jobs that need to be done timely (to the extent that we ban other people from doing them) leave the project at the first sign of trouble, then the clerking system is obviously not working as it should and maybe really needs to be changed. Zocky | picture popups 05:36, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Blah blah, please come back etc.Seriously though, you can't let people like that get to you. Kelly Martin did, and now she's just a sideliner. There will always be people out there who will be jealous of people who can do shit on Wikipedia that they can't, or who love "refactoring discussion pages where appropriate" (i.e. taking a cannon to the comments they disagree with) and hate arbitration/checkuser pages for their lack of "refactorability" by non-clerks. They just want to be able to mess with more stuff, to have less on Wikipedia that they can't muck with and control. In the end, it's what the arbitrators think that matters, since it's just a convenience for them (right?) and they're not going to listen to envious outbursts like these, so just ignore the anti-clerks and do what you do best. If you need a break I don't blame you, but I hope you come back. Milto LOL pia 05:50, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
chatAIM only. I emailed you my screen name. Never got any farther than that yet, and only that far to chat with my daughter at college. Thatcher131 06:36, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
New articleFYI: Scientology: The Now Religion. Please let me know if I'm being a bother with all these new articles for WP:DYK, or if that is alright with you. Keep me posted... Smee 08:01, 28 February 2007 (UTC).
Happy Birthday!!!Sorry it's a little late, but...
Clerk stuffHey, some controversy must have brewed while I was asleep; what happened? Something with clerks? —Signed, your friendly neighborhood MessedRocker. 11:08, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
ThanksThank you for the heads-up on David Lauder's complaint. This is all related to the AfD abuse by Astrotrain that started a few weeks ago. Neither side is particularly happy with me right now, which I take to mean I'm doing OK :) | Mr. Darcy talk 14:31, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
PingWill you look over User:Thatcher131/temp and let me know what you think (fix anything that needs fixing, etc). Also, I think the CU clerks' list needs to be updated, and could probably do without the footnotes (despite your fondness for wikitables). Thatcher131 20:16, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
You've got mailYou've got mail. --Durin 22:44, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
AN discussionThanks for heads-up. Tyrenius 02:14, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Golf Newsletter
New article, bookAgain, thank you so much for all of your help so far. Here is a new article for a potential WP:DYK... Cults of Unreason, something interesting about how later writers and scholars referred to weird groups and UFO cults as "cults of unreason", and the phrase stuck over the years. I managed to dig up 12 citations, trying to find more places that talk about the book to add more material... Please let me know what you think. Yours, Smee 12:19, 1 March 2007 (UTC).
Science Collaboration of the month
NCurse work 16:26, 1 March 2007 (UTC) DYK--Yomanganitalk 23:19, 1 March 2007 (UTC) |