User talk:David2006ABC
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, David2006ABC, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! ComputerJoe 13:38, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Reverted "Holy Cross College (UK) page
The style you wrote it in was not, in my view, encyclopediac. This may sound strange, but to me it seemed like you added too much information. For example the Courses Available was extremely long, and it wasn't wikified. The Wikipedia uses a funny markup language called WikiML. For bullet points in WikiML you simply use * for example, and its rare to find <br> necessary to use. And then the bit about contacting you would have been better on the article's discussion page. I hope you still contribute to the Wikipedia even after this revert. Oh and:
Remember to always sign all of your posts on talk pages. Typing four tildes after your comment ( ~~~~ ) will insert a signature showing your username and a date/time stamp, which is very helpful. ComputerJoe 13:48, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
- Oh OK then, i can understand what you mean now. i just didnt understand why it was reverted at first!!! thanks for taking the time to explain. I only used BR because when i didnt it crushed all the subjects onto one line and i didnt think that looked presentable. I would like to have another go, using the bulleted list like you suggested, or do you think another way is more appropriate?? I don't want it to be taken the wrong way though if i have another go!! it might seem to some people that im just reverting your revert, but i promise this is not my intention, my intention is to make every page on here as good as it can be and to provide as much (good) contribution as I can to Wikipedia. --David2006ABC 15:15, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
Oh right OK, i wasn't trying to go against you there or anything i just misunderstood what you meant!!!!!!! David2006ABC 15:38, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image tagging for Image:PC Diane Noble.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:PC Diane Noble.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:09, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Cheif Superintendant Charles Brownlow
A tag has been placed on Cheif Superintendant Charles Brownlow, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Signalhead 23:48, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:PC Honey Harman.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:PC Honey Harman.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 14:56, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Recess episode category
That Television shows category isn't used anymore. Anyways, they should have something like ['[Category:Recess epsisodes]'], which would then be in the ['[Category:Recess]']. At least their catted now, I guess. - Peregrine Fisher 06:31, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Yes, your probably right. Did not reliase the television shows category wasnt used anymore. I know, better an unused cat than not category at all! David 06:36, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
COuld you please add some more info to your recess sub-stubs and a screenshot or somrthing. Ernst Stavro Blofeld 13:41, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Of course, I am awaiting getting screenshots (which will have to be related to the episode obviously. And I do aim to contribute more to these articles and let them grow but also hoped that by creating them others would get involved and help too as we will get a lot more info then! David 23:24, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Louise Harrison
I have just been expanding your Louise Harrison article, although I can't find much info about her on the web. Shame there isn't more actually. I have always thought she's quite a good actress. 81.155.150.187 21:19, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
- Cheers! Like to see other people help expand articles I create and help on as it means a lot more information gets on the article to help everyone. I know, information is a bit scarce on the Internet for her. We'll just have to keep up the searching and hopefully make this page about Louise Harrison the most informational of them all! David 04:13, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, David2006ABC! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 02:52, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Welcome to VandalProof!
I fixed the approval bug from last night. Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 15:53, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Thank You David 03:38, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] A Genius Among Us (Recess episode)
I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article A Genius Among Us (Recess episode), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Player 03 22:39, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of Space Cadet (Recess episode)
An editor has nominated Space Cadet (Recess episode), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Space Cadet (Recess episode) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 18:13, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of Stand Up Randall (Recess episode)
An editor has nominated Stand Up Randall (Recess episode), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stand Up Randall (Recess episode) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 18:13, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of That Stinking Feeling (Recess episode)
An editor has nominated That Stinking Feeling (Recess episode), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/That Stinking Feeling (Recess episode) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 18:13, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of The Barnaby Boys (Recess episode)
An editor has nominated The Barnaby Boys (Recess episode), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Barnaby Boys (Recess episode) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 18:13, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of The Bet (Recess episode)
An editor has nominated The Bet (Recess episode), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Bet (Recess episode) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 18:13, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of The Challenge (Recess episode)
An editor has nominated The Challenge (Recess episode), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Challenge (Recess episode) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 18:13, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of The Girl was Trouble (Recess episode)
An editor has nominated The Girl was Trouble (Recess episode), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Girl was Trouble (Recess episode) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 18:13, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of The Lost Ball (Recess episode)
An editor has nominated The Lost Ball (Recess episode), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Lost Ball (Recess episode) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 18:13, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of The Ratings Game (Recess episode)
An editor has nominated The Ratings Game (Recess episode), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Ratings Game (Recess episode) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 18:13, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of The Shiner (Recess episode)
An editor has nominated The Shiner (Recess episode), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Shiner (Recess episode) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 18:13, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of The Substitute (Recess episode)
An editor has nominated The Substitute (Recess episode), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Substitute (Recess episode) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 18:13, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
