User talk:Debolaz

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Re: Chilean rose tarantula

Hello, thanks for your message regarding Chilean rose tarantula. You are right, but not at all. The humidity is needed. I made the change because some anonymous (maybe you) wrote they can stay on dry substrat. This point is not correct, but I agree on the low humidity. But very low humidity (dry) is also dangerous for them, although they are desert species. I think 25-50% humidity is the best for them. I have G. rosea, pulchra, actaeon, igeringi adults and slings in my breeding and I think they all likes 25-50% humidity, actaeon and iheringi likes maybe little bit more ... --Goliathus 12:27, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Moved from User talk:Debolaz/Badfaith

I am politely requesting that you remove this information from your page. It shows very bad faith to not only myself, but all potential editors to compile information like this on other users for no other reason than to incite personal attacks.

Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but Wikipedia is not the place for it.

TheChode 14:24, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Well, good faith is something one should assume if the user has done nothing to indicate that they have bad intentions and as the page documents, that is not the case here. You have repeated acts of vandalism and you've certainly not assumed good faith yourself but almost immediately suggested I had a secondary agenda without even reasoning why that would be the case. The latter is especially damaging to your credibility and even if you didn't have the motivation I wrote I suspected, it still looks really bad to other people.

In short, it's well documented why good faith shouldn't be assumed in this case. And you explicitly stated you would not listen to any reason but kept reinserting your edit whileas I agreed to postpone the revert untill the expected release date even though it's pretty clear that the game in question falls under the definition of vaporware untill release. All you've done suggests you're trying to push a certain view for no rational reason, and then it certainly becomes suspicious when this view just happens to be something the publishers of the game would really like to see pushed. But do you understand that just having this point of view is not the exclusive reason why you were listed, it's mainly because of the ways you tried to steamroll others by any means neccesary to enforce it?

So please, don't try to use that diplomatic language crap to it seem like you're the one who is being reasonable here because that certainly isn't the case. Debolaz 19:53, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

As a sidenote, I am considering renaming this page to "People suspected of acting in bad faith" since if I don't I'll most likely have to create more pages eventually. Debolaz 20:02, 22 February 2007 (UTC)