User talk:Dgies
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot |
|---|---|
| Any sections older than 7 days are automatically archived to User talk:Dgies/Archive 2. Sections without timestamps are not archived. An index of the archives may be found at User talk:Dgies/Archive index. |
| edit |
|
| Archives |
[edit] VandalSniper
You've been approved to use VandalSniper. Please let me know if you have any problems getting it working. --Chris (talk) 01:03, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] The Kill
Hello, Dgies! Thank you for reverting vandalism to Wikipedia, which you did in The Kill. After you revert, I would recommend also warning the users whose edits you revert on their talk pages with an appropriate template or custom message. This will serve to direct new users towards the sandbox, educate them about Wikipedia, and a stern warning to a vandal may prevent him or her from vandalizing again. Thanks! Kaori (Please sign my autograph book!) 01:14, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
- I reverted it over WP:NOR concerns. Since the user had no previous warnings and it seemed like a good faith edit, I felt leaving a vandalism warning was overly harsh. In retrospect, I should have left a uw-unsourced warning, which I have now done. —dgiestc 01:44, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you for clarifying that. Kaori (Please sign my autograph book!) 01:58, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AfD
- Thanks, I'm an old man at heart, it seems ^_^ JuJube 03:32, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Anti-Vandalism Award
Dear Dgies, <<<Hey, thanks for the barnstar. Was there any particular vandalism I beat you to reverting?>>> Yes, a lot or reverts, (because I am an old school patroller) that's one reason I decided to give you a medal. You are doing a great job.--Cyril Thomas 10:05, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re:protection
Hey, sorry about that. I did look at the log but I got a different list when I clicked, not sure what happened there, but the page is protected again now so alls well that ends well! Thanks for the heads-up SGGH 10:19, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] 69.158.97.106
Could you block this user? The guys mad that I criticized the picture of him sticking fish up his butt, and he's been bothering me ever since. 69.158.97.106 (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log)
--Meaneager 04:50, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Nevermind. Alphachimp blocked him. --Meaneager
- I'm not an admin, but I noticed the guy jumped to 69.158.105.31 (talk • contribs • WHOIS) to continue his attack. I reported the new IP to WP:AIV and requested that your user page be semi-protected so only established users (including yourself) may edit it for the next 24 hours. —dgiestc 05:31, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] User:Meaneager
I went ahead and semi-protected User:Meaneager for 24 hours. I hope by the end of that time our vandal friend will have gotten bored. Heimstern Läufer 05:30, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Judygarlandishot
Actually I misread that one as Judy-Garland-is-shot (rather than hot) and felt it was caught by the violent actions prohibiton. Forget I brought it up. WjBscribe 17:08, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
- Only edit was clear vandalism to the main page FA was also in the block reason so I don't think there's any need to unblock this one... WjBscribe 17:11, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Elton John Image
- Re: User talk:Dannyg3332#Image removal 20:31, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Apologies, but all images provided are in the process of being removed from Commons due to the abundance of pansy ass wanna-be wiki admins without the backbone to take a stand against a user making up fictitious policies to justify his edits.Dannyg3332 20:26, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Apologies, but all images need to be removed from commons as they are the copyrighted property of a third party.Dannyg3332 20:32, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Bottom line....... I was wrong to upload these images. To avoid litigation they all need to be removed, or at least tagged as copyright infringing and tagged for deletion promptly.Dannyg3332 20:37, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Chuck Yeager
- Replied: User talk:Charlie622 22:05, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
k sorry and thanks for the info. I will look for references
[edit] Re. Pingback
Hey, you elaborated very good answers to Terence's questions. I added a few more. I think that you're ready for adminship. I can nominate you anytime you wish, should you require a nominator or co-nominator. :-) Best regards, Húsönd 19:40, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- Okey dokey. :-) By the way, I am once again satisfied with your answers. Well done! Regards, Húsönd 23:58, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AIV report
Hi, the user you reported to WP:AIV doesn't exist. Did you spell it right? Or has someone wiped the name from the database? --Wafulz 04:19, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- Replied: [1] 04:26, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Respuesta de El filoloco
Querido amigo:
El artículo "Teoría de la conspiración electrónica" aún no ha sido borrado de la Wikipedia en español. Tampoco es un ensayo original, porque está sacado de la bibliografía que en él aparece. Un saludo afectuoso. 
El filóloco - Talk to me 07:05, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] A haiku for you
"I despise haikus!"
This is what you said to me
Is this one okay? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 134.117.185.189 (talk • contribs). 07:01, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] More poetry for you my friend!
Welcome to the talk page by this guy;
He is not a fan of poetry, this is why;
He thinks this business is really serious;
Lurking on the Internet, very mysterious;
Eight equals equals equals D;
Now I hope you see;
And on that note I bid you farewell;
On this vandalism, I hope you do not dwell;
For I leave you this one last joke;
I'm going to go take a toke. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 134.117.185.189 (talk • contribs). 07:01, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] yer page got vandelized
no prob! the_undertow talk 07:33, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks
Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my talk page. IrishGuy talk 00:24, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Anti-Colbert sentiment is not appropriate
Wikipedia needs to take into account popular culture. It is ignorant for you to delete any entry without fully considering its validity just because the source of it happens to be someone like Steven Colbert. Steven Colbert is a great man and brilliant thinker. Plus, his wife is hotter than the cyber chick you masturbate to every 16 minutes. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.162.136.179 (talk) 02:02, 1 April 2007 (UTC).
[edit] My RfA
- Thanks for the support position. However, I've decided to withdraw my acceptance because of real WP:CIVIL concerns. I will try again later when I've proven to myself and others that my anger will no longer interfere with my abilities as a Wikipedia editor. Thanks again, and I'll see you around here shortly. :) JuJube 04:12, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] My RfA
Thank you for your support in my recent successful RfA. --Anthony.bradbury 14:05, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Himno de Cantabria
Yes, I made the translation. I know it´s very literal, in fact as you can see I wrote in the edition page this note: !--Correct translation?--. That´s all I can make with my low level of english and over all my scarce knowledge of english poetic resources. Feel free to introduce changes.--Uhanu 18:10, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] I have semi-protected your user page...
...for a couple days and blocked that last vandalizing account. Let me know if you want it unprotected before a couple days. —Wknight94 (talk) 20:40, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re:Your signature is broken
It's not broken, I'm just using the easy, "fake wikilink" signature, popular a while back. --[[User:Pie Man 360 | UserPage Talk about me!]] 21:35, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks
Thanks for fixing up my user page. I have no idea why I got hit with that.... --Wafulz 22:03, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
