Talk:Dissymmetry of lift

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Physics Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, which collaborates on articles related to physics.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale. [FAQ]
???	This article has not yet received an importance rating within physics.
Help with this template Please rate this article, and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

Thanks to whoever added the links

[edit] Proposed merge

Copied over from Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Physics

---

Dissymetry of Lift looks more complete than Dissymmetry of lift, but the correct title is "Dissymmetry of lift". Maybe someone can cut the Dissymetry of Lift and paste it over Dissymmetry of lift. Would that be sufficient for a merge? GeorgeJBendo 07:51, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

In doing this one should make sure no useful information is lost. Calling the article Dissymetry of Lift "S" for "source" and Dissymmetry of lift "T" for "target", the most appropriate procedure for this particular case (S is "better", T has the proper title) would appear to be:

1. Open S and T in two separate edit windows.
2. Cut/paste any non-redundant useful content from T into S.
3. Cut/paste the entire content from S into T.
4. Preview and edit T until it looks good and consistent, and then save it, with an edit summary "merge content from [[Dissymetry of Lift]]"
5. Replace the contents of S by #REDIRECT [[Dissymmetry of lift]] {{R from misspelling}} to the source page, and save it.
6. Check "What links here" on S for "double redirects" (pages redirecting to the now redirect page S).
7. Fix any double redirects by making them redirect directly to T.

 --Lambiam^Talk 09:00, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

---

Done. --Guinnog 21:12, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Analysis

1. Dissymmetry of lift exists or occurs across any kind of rotor in translating flight.
2. This article sounds more like a proof than an encyclopedia article discussing an aerodynamic condition of rotorcraft flight.
3. Anyone reading this article will be most likely end up more confused due to the amount of errors in the article.

I was gonna redirect part of another article to this one, but I am considering just filling out the section of the other article instead. I won't edit this article, I would prefer to start over from scratch. --Born2flie 05:01, 20 February 2007 (UTC)