User talk:Disastrophe

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I dislike those red links.

[edit] Spoilers

I noticed you re-added the spoilers tag into the Shadow of the Colossus article without even leaving a message on the talk page. You even ignored the commented warning about adding the spoilers tag, and labeled your edit as a minor one (when minor edits are supposed to be only for minor, nondisputed edits)! I suggest you read the already-extensive discussion about the spoilers tag's exclusion from the page before you consider re-adding it; I also recommend you be more careful with your edits in the future, trying to reach a strong consensus and working with others to make a better page rather than simply ignoring all the work others have done thus far. Edit: This last part seems a bit harsh - I do realize that the consensus seems to be that the spoilers tag is necessary. That isn't the problem; I just think that the method you chose (a "sneaky" seeming Minor edit, with no comment on the talk page) was a poor one. Feel free to add the spoiler tag again, but at the very least leave it as a regular edit and mention on the talk page the reasoning. I apologize if I sounded a bit off here; it's just that html comments are there for a reason, even if it's time for them to go - and that's what talk pages are for, not Minor edit's edit summaries. Thanks for your time.  :) -JC 02:14, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply. Honest mistakes are fine :) Hopefully I didn't come across as overly upset, it wasn't my intent. I just have had problems with people making obviously non-minor edits and purposefully checking them as minor, so I was concerned when there was another minor non-minor edit, especially when it removed comments and didn't involve the Talk Page at all. -JC 20:19, 8 April 2007 (UTC)