User:Dovi
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
Wikimedia is cool!
|
| Wikipedia:Babel | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||
| Search user languages | |||||||||
A brief hello. The possibilities in Wikipedia are endless, and I'm glad to be a part of it.
Contents |
[edit] Wikisource · ויקיטקסט
I am most active at Wikisource, in Hebrew (especially) and in English. That is the best place to contact me:
- My User Page at English Wikisource (talk)
- My User Page at Hebrew Wikisource (talk)
- דף המשתמש שלי בוויקיטקסט עברית
- שיחה
If you are unfamiliar with Wikisource and would like to learn more about it, there is no finer introduction than Danny Wool's fine article about the project. Read it!
I helped push forward the process of setting up language subdomains for Wikisource, first in Hebrew (August, 2004) and then later in English (September, 2005) and other languages (2005-2006). Wikisource is now at the point where it stands on its own feet in so many languages that my help is no longer needed to help establish new ones, a fact which gives me great pleasure.
I think it is extraordinary that the Wikimedia Foundation provides a framework for people of all languages and cultures to make free-content versions of the classic texts in their language available to the world, as well as to build the framework for editing, organizing, and displaying these classic texts in their own language.
But besides Wikisource, I have also been contributing to Wikipedia since May 2004, and have written of number of articles in the past, especially in the field of Judaica (but also on some completely unrelated topics). I don't contribute massive amounts, nor am I even around most days, but I do hope I have been able to improve quality over the long term in some areas.
I am very interested in getting the two projects, Wikipedia and Wikisource, to use each other actively as resources.
[edit] Censorship
One thing I feel strongly about as a Wikimedian is that Wikimedia must not bow to government censorship. Wikimedia is committed to making information freely available in a neutral way. To hamper Wikimedia projects because of concerns about government censorship is not neutral, but a way of taking sides.
Therefore, congratulations on the creation of Chinese Wikinews! The Wikimedia Foundation is already an outstanding organization, and this makes it even better yet.
My prediction: The Chinese government will eventually stop blocking Wikimedia websites. Initially, this will be because blocking an open website, built by contributors, whose only "crime" is a committment to neutrality - will prove too embarrassing to them to continue blocking it. In the longer term, it will be because Wikimedia is simply too powerful an organization. Yes, powerful. Powerful not because of its armies and police (zero), but because it provides tools and products that are so important and useful - eventually, indispensible - that China will simply not be able to afford to do without it.
Instead, the government may try to influence Chinese Wikipedia, Wikinews, etc. by pushing its own views within the product itself. That in itself, of course, will be a victory, when the government will be forced to defend its positions by force of argument rather than force of arms.
- My personal collection of links relevant to Wikimedia projects in Chinese
- Blocking of Wikipedia in mainland China
[edit] Musings on Wikipedia Languages
- Under 100 articles = future potential (because at least the wiki has been set up), but nothing worthwhile right now.
- Over 100 articles = Signs of life.
- Over 1000 articles = The community is small but now truly alive; the encyclopedia still has little current value. (As of 17.06.06 this is 54 languages.)
- Over 10,000 articles = Already a resource that has significant value; built and supported by a small but significant community. (As of 17.06.06 this is 34 languages.)
- Over 100,000 articles = A resource of great value, built and supported by a strong community. (As of 17.06.06 this is 9 languages.)
- Over 1,000,000 articles = A tremendous resource the likes of which the world has never before seen, built and supported by a truly vast community. (As of 17.06.06 this is just 1 language.)
My predictions for 2007:
- By the end of the year there will be Wikipedias in up to 100 languages that have 10,000 or more articles (i.e. 100 different languages with significantly valuable content and communities).
- At least a dozen more languages will have 100,000 or more articles (i.e. resources of great value with very strong communities behind them). The 10,000 to 100,000 jump is far bigger than the smaller ones, especially for smaller languages that will not be able to maintain a high exponential rate of growth forever.
- List of Wikipedias at Meta
- ISO 639 Code Tables (the ultimate list of languages and their codes)
- Multilingual MediaWiki (the technical future of multilingualism in the software)
[edit] Major Software Changes
MediaWiki.org (watch) | MediaWiki roadmap | OmegaWiki (watch)
Wikitech-l mail archives | MediaWiki-l mail archives
There are several major software changes that have been talked about for several years. Serious coding work has been done on all of them by dedicated programmers, and all of them are planned for the future. But most important, they spotlight the central technical needs of Wikimedia projects that have not yet been provided for.
As the programmers continue to make progress, the one-by-one implementation of these features will vastly increase the usefullness of all the Wikimedia projects:
- For coordination: Single log-in for all projects in all languages (Brion's current plans).
- For reliability:
- Stable versions of articles (& Wikipedia:Stable versions).
- Article validation (& Article validation feature [1]) which may be an aspect of stable versions (as it partially is already in the German Wikipedia esperiment)
- For versatility:
- Database features for pages (OmegaWiki)
- My own suggestion for much greater versatility is Labeled section transclusion. This would allow designating any part of a page to be used in other contexts through transclusion (rather than just whole pages). It seems like an obvious "next step" given the current nature of the Mediawiki software and how it currently uses transclusion. Though initially conceived with Wikisource in mind, it could find myriad uses in all the projects. Having become a working extension, this feature even made the news at the Wikipedia Signpost.
- Other details:
- Unicode normalization considerations (bugzilla:2399 includes a response by Ken Whistler, Unicode 5.0 editor). This is the Wikipedia:Niqqud problem.
[edit] Interests
The following was my first "hello" to Wikipedia:
For the time being I plan to contribute to articles on Judaism, but avoiding the ones that spark polemics. (That unfortunately is one of the disadvantages of Wikipedia.)
Would love to be in contact with others working on the same topics.Dovi 08:58, 18 May 2004 (UTC)
