User:Dreftymac/Docs/ArgumentByCategory
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This is an essay. It is not a policy or guideline, it simply reflects some opinions of its authors. Please update the page as needed, or discuss it on the talk page. |
Contents |
[edit] Argument by Category
There is some matter at issue and one of the proponents of a particular viewpoint supports that viewpoint with a generalized appeal to an entire domain or sub-domain of an academic discipline or body of knowledge.
Examples:
- all extreme finitists other than yourself recognize that ...
- in all of neoclassical economics, there is no disagreement about ...
- it is a widely established practice in biology to assume ...
- It's proven sociological fact that people have a tendency to ...
[edit] implications of "argument by category"
- implies the matter at issue has already been resolved;
- implies the existence of a uniform, "monolithic establishment" without acknowledging that the establishment is comprised of individuals and organizations, each with unique perspectives;
- implies that there is some "fixed practice" (within the establishment) that is not subject to change or refinement;
- implies a "fixed boundary" (around the establishment) that is not subject to influence or refinement by related concepts in outside disciplines;
[edit] fundamental limitations of argument by category
- every major discipline has "grey areas" and "contestable claims";
- every major discipline has terms and concepts that mean different things depending on which expert you ask;
The less trivial a matter is, the greater its potential for alternate re-interpretation by different people. The more trivial a matter is, the more likely it is to be readily apparent to anyone of sufficient familiarity with the establishment. Therefore, "Argument by Category" is many times either: 1) too obvious to be worth mentioning; or 2) a side-stepping of a matter at issue as though it were not at issue.
[edit] Contrast basic definition and cross-domain comparisons
It is not "argument by cateogry" to present basic definitions or comparisons.
For example the following kinds of statements could be considered comparisons:
- Most economists use the greek letter "Delta" to mean "change", but many lawyers use it to mean "Defendant".
- In the automotive repair industry, certification is often a pre-requisite for employment, not so for the plumbing industry.
- Zoologists tend to apply a different meaning to "endogenous" than most sociologists.
[edit] See also
- Wikipedia:Amnesia test
- Wikipedia:Avoid_weasel_words(see "Anthropomorphisms")
