Wikipedia:Editor review/casmith 789
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] casmith_789*
casmith 789 (talk • contribs) After returning from a two month break from Wikipedia, I have decided to take up an editor review. This is to ask others what I have been doing wrong, and to help me evolve and improve as an editor. Eventually, I would like to become an administrator, however I do not feel I am ready yet, due to my lack of involvement in Wikipedia processes such as WP:AIV and talks on Wikipedia namespaces. I patrol special:newpages regularly (when I am online) and, looking through my contributions, I have noticed that CAT:CSD is not cleared as speedily as hoped. This is one of my reasons for wanting to become an administrator. Two months ago, I felt that the standard of new articles being created had increased, but now it is the same as before, and so I wish to know what else I could do to help this, and other areas of Wikipedia. -- Casmith_789 (talk) 14:42, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Reviews
Comments
- View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool.
- View this user's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool
Questions
- Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- I have not created many articles, or contributed to many articles. However, the two articles I have created (Penmon (place) and Problems in coal mining) I felt were useful additions after finding that they were not on Wikipedia. I am especially pleased with the first of these two articles, and I want to get it rated (from FA class to Stub class) but I do not know where (can someone please help!?) My contributions to the mainspace, which are around 900, does not include the many articles I have tagged for speedy deletion. I am particularly pleased with my contributions there.
- Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- Any conflicts over editing I feel have been delt with in a civil manner, and so I feel that I will act accordingly in the future. I have had a few conflicts when tagging for speedy deletion, but I feel that any conflict I have had has been sorted out quickly and efficiently and no-one involved has been hurt afterwards as a result. Other users have influenced my views on speedy deletion, but none of them have caused me stress and that is something I find good from an editing point of view.
