User talk:EliminatorJR
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Discussion
[edit] Re: Comments
I always assume good faith.
-
- With all due respect, I don't think that you did in this case, but I could be wrong. Sorry if we got off on the wrong foot, but it seemed to me like another example of someone on Wikipedia with a POV trying to protect a biased article from being made neutral by threatening another editor. (It does happen.)
I am an educator, and while I may not agree with critical pedagogy, to claim it is 'Marxist-inspired' is nonsensical.
-
- I'm a graduate student in the School of Education at Stanford University, and with all due respect, I don't think that describing critical pedagogy as Marxist in "nonsensical."
-
- I don't think that it's POV to think that the article that I edited was full of superfluous praise of CP. Is it really appropriate for an encyclopedia article to feature quotes from movies and music that have no direct association with the topic? I don't think so. Wikipedia policy states that it is better to not say anything about a subject than to convey false or inappropriate information. I believe that that's what I was doing with this article.
-
- Speaking of articles, I just created one called School of Education. If you wouldn't mind, please take a look at it and make comments, additions, etc. - Skaraoke 23:31, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Your recent edit of Theory_of_multiple_intelligences
Hello, fellow vandalism fighter. You recently reverted some vandalism at this diff. In the future, please be more careful. Make a point of actually looking at the edit you are reverting to. As you can see, in this case, you reverted to a very stupid edit -- which went unnoticed because the next people who came along didn't look past your reversion. I've seen this sort of thing happen time and time again. Luckily, this one was caught fairly quickly. Best, Cgingold 14:51, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia talk:Notability (people)#Regarding notability of Football (soccer) players
Hi, seeing you have been involved in previous Afd debates on the subject I invite you to contribute to this discussion to clarify certain issues about football player notability. I think clearer guidelines are needed to avoid repeated inappropriate nominations for deletion and time consuming discussions. Cheers! StephP 19:42, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
