Template talk:Emotion
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Sarge Baldy, why add jealousy? I don't see it listed among the basic emotions, by any scholar's opinion (not just Plutchik's)... --Shallot 22:00, 15 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Noisy now also added guilt and remorse (also without any mention of it in the log message). Same comment as the above. --Joy [shallot] 13:30, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)
I was just going by entries in the Category:Emotion. I can't imagine that guilt and remorse shouldn't be considered emotions: if there are a 'classical' set of emotions, then perhaps there should be separate – more exclusive and prescriptively named – category and template? At some time in the future, I may look at What links here and add any others I find.
- It's okay, but the template started with a canonical short list (emotion theory). I agree that its name is too generic. I just want to make sure we have some plan WRT this whole thing, and not just keep expanding it in a random manner. --Joy [shallot] 19:22, 22 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Plan? I leave that to the project manager! :-) Noisy 20:25, 22 Aug 2004 (UTC)
As to why I forgot to mention their addition when I was rejigging the template, I was just carried away with trying to get it to look pretty, and forgot the original reason for going there. :-)
The entries were all run together to try and eliminate the blank lines at the top and bottom of the list. Noisy 15:53, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- I never saw those blank lines...? --Joy [shallot]
- Seems it's browser dependent: the blank lines aren't there under MIE, but they are under Netscape. Noisy 20:25, 22 Aug 2004 (UTC)
See also: {{Emotion-footer}} for a more extensive list. Rfrisbietalk 17:43, 26 April 2006 (UTC)