Talk:Ensemble Interpretation
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, which collaborates on articles related to physics. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale. [FAQ] | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating within physics. | |
|
Please rate this article, and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. |
||
[edit] Occam's Razor?
Am I being ignorant or is this one the only interpretation that survives Occam's Razor? Most other interpretations seem to be based on the idea that quantum mechanics are inconsistent with the universal law of cause and effect or invoke some metaphysical oddities such as creating "mirror universes" or whatnot. 134.95.171.90 12:14, 30 January 2007 (UTC) (Ashmodai)
The Ensemble Interpretation may survive some of the effects of Occam's Razor, however, it is not as complete in its scope or (according to single particle experiments) as accurate as the other interpretations, and thus the issue is largely moot. 72.94.11.86
[edit] Many innacuracies.
This is one of the worst QM interpretations, since it cannot account for single-particle experiments. There are many problems with the article.1Z 20:52, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
I have started a rewrite. Too tired to continue, will polish it tomorrow.1Z 02:39, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
