User talk:Envidia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1 OVA
2 Sloth
3 Page moves
4 Orphaned fair use image (Image:WRATH.JPG)
5 Orphaned fair use image (Image:GLUTTONY.JPG)
6 Orphaned fair use image (Image:ENVY.JPG)
7 Orphaned fair use image (Image:Sloth2.JPG)
8 North America (Americas) delete review

[edit] OVA

In reply to your question to me regarding OVA reflections, no, I don't know. Wolf ODonnell 11:34, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sloth

I reverted your no-consensus, cut-and-paste move of Sloth. If you wish to propose a move, please use WP:RM and do not perform any more copy-and-paste moves which violate the GFDL. Savidan 04:05, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Page moves

Please don't move pages unless and until you know what you are doing. Also please don't move pages without concensus. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 14:48, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:WRATH.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:WRATH.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 00:41, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:GLUTTONY.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:GLUTTONY.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:ENVY.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:ENVY.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Sloth2.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Sloth2.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

[edit] North America (Americas) delete review

Thanks for voting and expressing your opinion about the article North America (Americas). As you know the debate was closed, and the result was "to delete it". Since I, as the creator of the article, thought the decision was hasty and wrong, I opened a to review the deletion.

This mean that administrators and regular editors can vote again and, most importantly, argument why the decision was wrong or right. Please, take a look at this and express your opinion: