Talk:Erik Möller

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article was nominated for deletion on 2006-12-18. The result of the discussion was Redirect to Wikimedia Foundation.

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]

This article was nominated for deletion as Erik Moeller on 26 March 2006. The result of the discussion was delete.

This article was nominated for deletion as Erik Möller on 10 June 2006. The result of the discussion was speedy delete as recreation under a different title.

An individual covered in this article, Erik Möller, has edited Wikipedia as Eloquence (talk • contribs).

Contents 1 Request for full article here 2 Strawpoll 2.1 There should be an article 2.2 There should be a redirect to the Wikimedia Foundation article 2.3 Not sure where to stand 2.4 Comments/other

[edit] Request for full article here

Request that this be developed into a full article since Erik Möller is now Executive Secretary of the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees . see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Eloquence Lumos3 13:05, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Done. Dan100 (Talk) 16:43, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Since this was reverted, I strongly encourage the redirect be removed and the full article restored. --badlydrawnjeff talk 20:38, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Strawpoll

Clearly it's not entirely known where the community stands in regards to giving our longtime contributor and trustee Erik an article. I wish to conduct an informal strawpoll to see where the community in general stands.

[edit] There should be an article

1. Strongly support this option. --badlydrawnjeff talk 16:21, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
2. Strongly support this option. WAS 4.250 18:23, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
3. Support --Terence Ong _{(C | R)} 09:24, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] There should be a redirect to the Wikimedia Foundation article

1. Support this as there's no option to delete this brown-nosing bit of self reference about an unotable member of a charity organisation, who if he were on the board of trustees of any other NPC would have been deleted within five minutes of creation. Proto::► 20:49, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Not sure where to stand

1. ★MESSEDROCKER★ 16:08, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Comments/other