Talk:Erotic lactation
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
|
Contents |
[edit] Founding Erotic lactation and merging from Milk fetishism
This article is a direct replacement for the Milk fetishism page. See Talk:Milk fetishism for discussion regarding the renaming and merger of these articles.
[edit] Appropriate naming
I wonder if the subject of Adult Nursing or Adult Nursing Relationship should be its own article. The reason is that there appear to be people who don't consider it erotic or sexual in nature, but primarily a relationship nurturing type thing. Of course, I don't buy that, but if there are reliable citations out there that assert it is not sexual, I think it should be split from this article. Thoughts? --Ars Scriptor 14:21, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
- The greek word "Eros" means "love" or "sensual love". Therefore "erotic lactation" isn't most bad I think - it can mean either the relationship or the feelings... --Carlo
[edit] Image removed
The article featured the image http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:MiniCouple.gif , wich I decided to remove, because I found it completely pointless to feature a crude miniature, wich could even be considered pornographic (but who cares about blocky pieces of porn anyway?) Frank Miller 21:54, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- I have reverted this as a kind of vandalism. --Fritz Bollmann 13:09, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- I have reverted that as a display of WP:OWN Fruit Basket 04:17, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: I personally had asked the creator of this picture and got personally his general permission. --Fritz Bollmann 20:46, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- I have reverted that as a display of WP:OWN Fruit Basket 04:17, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Against masculinity?
From the introduction: "But generally speaking one must assume this to be a rather strong taboo, and it can be concluded that a man suckling on a female breast is in contradiction to well established images of masculinity." If suckling a female breast was a contradiction in St Bernard's time then the tense is wrong. I don't know why one must assume this generally and there does not appear to be any evidence to support the claim. As it stands, since it is written in present tense, most people I have had cause to discuss such matters with actually believe that suckling on a female breast, whether the female be lactating or not, is a very manly thing to do that every man should be aiming to do more. Waerloeg 06:38, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Right, suckling/kissing the breasts/nipples isn't a taboo of course - rather it's the oppossite. But drinking the milk directly from the breast is a taboo, at least if done repeated/continuous. Might be this is a question of my insufficient english. Can any of the native english-spekers help? --Fritz Bollmann 21:05, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks dude. Have done so. Incidentally, if this is your "insufficient English" come set up a language school: The locals could do with a few pointers. Waerloeg 07:46, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Archiving of talk page
I've archived the old discussions of this talk page. See Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines and Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page for more information. Robotman1974 10:21, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- Well done, Thank You --Fritz Bollmann 08:36, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] effects of morning after pill on lactation
Is there any negative effects on the baby if the mother takes the morning after pill? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.193.45.20 (talk) 07:01, 9 January 2007 (UTC).
[edit] Very Wide Spread?
The article says 'Lactation games:... Very widespread in the time after child birth...' Okay? Sez who? Can we get a citation please? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.157.180.136 (talk) 04:30, 12 January 2007 (UTC).
- Done - thank you for the hint. I was a just existing reference ( Rogers, Lois: Earth dads give breast milk a try, The Sunday Times, March 13, 2005). --Caruso —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.190.126.226 (talk) 09:56, 12 January 2007 (UTC).
[edit] Adult Breastfeeding & Survival
There is a segment of the Adult Nursing Community who believe Adult Breastfeeding dates back to the early development of the human species, and that maintaining a lactation response within an Adult Nursing Relationship is not as difficult as previously believed.
The theory is that primitive men sought lactating women for supplemental nourishment during seasonal or winter famine; and that women maintained their milk supply for most of their adult lives. Women store fat easier than men, women have slower metabolisms than men, and women can initiate lactation independent of pregnancy or childbirth. This theory embraces the metabolic differences between men and women and gives a lone male hunter a practical survival reason for keeping and protecting a woman in the wilderness. It ties details of lactation, bonding, fertility, pregnancy, miscarriage, childbirth and infant mortality into the overall survival equation. It promotes the notion that Adult Breastfeeding is a survival tool unique to our species and is more about survival instincts and bonding than it is about sexual gratification or fetish. It also explains why human females have enlarged breasts, why men are attracted to female breasts, why lactation promotes infertility, why women often have too much milk after childbirth, and why the emotions generated within Adult Nursing Relationships are so powerful. Mlklvr 22:27, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Removed link
CCRoxtar has removed the SpicyTalk link, because the discussion page is unreachable. Because this discussion page was very informative, we should look from time to time, whether the page was down occasionally only. --Julia
- I have restored the Spicy Talk link today, because it works again. Probably the site was down for some days only. --Fritz Bollmann 08:13, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Link to Roman Charity
There's a delete-revert-delete-revert fight since some time about a link to the Roman Charity article. Deletion argument: "It's incest". Reverting argument "No censorship".
Nor the Roman Charity article or the link is from me, but let me explain the background as short as possible: The story tells a major conflict: Watch an existing taboo (incest in this case) or saving a live by breaking this taboo. The story is discussed for 2000 years and longer. Censoring it now, probably looks a bit provincial ;-) --Fritz Bollmann 07:58, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- Apodosis: I have added a detailed Roman Charity chapter with an explanation, why this story is interesting in context with erotic lactation. Can any of you have a look at my spelling errors? Thank You. --Fritz Bollmann 10:21, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
