User talk:67.119.122.102
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
If you're planning on adding external links to a slew of pages, you must be prepared to demonstrate that they are not spam or advertising. Otherwise, they will likely be deleted. Having looked at the links, I am skeptical - the information they provide is shallow, and appears to be geared towards driving users to consult an attorney (which, granted, is generally a good idea). Also, as these links have not been used heretofore as source material, they should probably be at the bottom of the list. Cheers! BD2412, Esq. T 22:04, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to use Wikipedia for advertising, you will be blocked from editing. -- GraemeL (talk) 00:32, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- GraemeL (talk) 00:43, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Reference removed from LegalMatch
Why did you remove this link?
If you are working for LegalMatch, you should either try to keep your contributions neutral or choose another article to work on. I will restore the link and reconsider your contributions here where you did add some information, but also a negative point of view towards CasePost and a positive one towards LegalMatch. Your other link removal has already been reverted. Tinus 16:43, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Please do not censor the LegalMatch article -- use the talk page
Please do not delete links to Department of Justice documents at support the article text.
Thank you,
--A. B. (talk) 21:56, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] External links on the LegalMatch page
Hi. Regarding these links you added to the LegalMatch article:
- http://www.amazon.com/LegalMatch/dp/B00006C0A2 -- Reviews of LegalMatch on Amazon.com:
- We occasionally link to reviews that have editorial supervision (such as a newspaper book review) but not to review sites where anyone can post a note and say whatever. It's the same as a forum where the information and opinions range widely in quality. There's just such a gap btween the stuff on a forum or review site and our own internal values of "No Original Research", "Veriability" and "Neutral Point of View".
- http://legalmatch.typepad.com -- LegalMatch Life - LegalMatch's Blog
- We dont't link to blogs normally. It's sort of a gray area here since the article is about Legal Match
- More importantly, LegalMatch already has links from their web site to their blog
- http://newspad.prweb.com/search.jsp?textQuery=LegalMatch&hitsPerPage=20 -- Recent LegalMatch Press Releases on PRWeb:
- LegalMatch already links to their press releases from their web site.
--A. B. (talk) 19:25, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 | This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. Registering also hides your IP address. [IP info · Traceroute · WHOIS · Abuse · City · RDNS] · [RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean] |
