User talk:69.140.68.72

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1 February 2006
2 June 2006
- 2.1 CSICP additions
- 2.2 Nonsense at Alien autopsy
3 August 2006
4 September 2006
5 October 2006
6 December 2006
7 February 2007

[edit] February 2006

This is your only warning. The vandalism, such as that you've done to Oral sex, is sufficiently serious to warrant a block. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rory096 01:12, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. The block is for a period of 24 hours. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. --Nlu (talk) 02:05, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] June 2006

[edit] CSICP additions

I reverted the edits you made to the CSICP page because they did not meet the neutral point of view policy that is used as the measuring stick for encyclopedia articles at this website. Please take the time to familiarize yourself with that policy OR add your comments to the discussion page and ask for help from someone else to add them in a neutral manner to the article. Thanks. ju66l3r 21:10, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Also with regard to these edits, please familiarize yourself with the Wikipedia:Three-revert rule. You are not allowed to replace the same or substantially similar edit more than 3 times in 24 hours.

But perhaps most importantly, if you're looking for a place where you can publicly call people "idiots," Wikipedia isn't the place you're looking for. KarlBunker 21:39, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nonsense at Alien autopsy

A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. KC9CQJ 19:02, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] August 2006

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Cheese, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. KOS | talk 19:57, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- KOS | talk 20:02, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] September 2006

Thank you for experimenting with the page Wikipedia on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --Mnem e son 12:13, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] October 2006

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dipics 21:14, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] December 2006

[edit] Your edit to Bigfoot

Your recent edit to Bigfoot (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 16:06, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Rack (torture) on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Budgiekiller 20:47, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Jon-Erik Beckjord. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Budgiekiller 21:46, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Maybe

... if you could learn the difference between adding your opinions and adding cited, verifiable facts to articles, you wouldn't keep getting reverted. Fan-1967 21:47, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Here's a hint: Phrasing like "known for his preposterous and incompletely "reasoned" ideas" would qualify as opinion. Fan-1967 21:49, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome

Hello, 69.140.68.72, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Dweller 22:24, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Further well-intentioned words

Hi You're clearly new to Wikipedia and have hit up against some problems. Can I make a few suggestions? One is to register with a user name. You'll find it brings (a few) benefits, not least of which is a bit of your own personality to your edits. Another thought is that as you're new here, you're experiencing some frustrations which is very common. The "rules" WP operates on can be a bit mystifying at first. I strongly recommend you read the articles I posted in my welcome message above this, have some WP:TEA and spend some time getting to know the place. WP:POV seems to be the issue you're mainly bumping into, so perhaps that article should be where you start. And if you want any help or advice, please feel free to drop me a line here. Night night. --Dweller 22:28, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Responding to your message

Hi. Re Bigfoot. I know very little about the subject but know reasonably well how Wikipedia works. See this ([1]) edit that you made and which was presumably reverted by someone. Your comment is far from invalid, but it is unsupported. Your claim needs a citation, to prove you aren't some fruitcake making up a fatuuous, unsustainable claim. Find one or two such scientists and quote the citation when you edit (put it between a <ref> and a </ref>). Re scientific articles... we've done well when periodicals have compared the accuracy of our technical articles with those in Britannica, but I'm sure they can do with some enhancing! If you discover inaccuracies, just edit them. If what you're adding or changing needs a citation, use it. Usually, if you can anticipate a change you'll make will be controversial, it's best to discuss it at the article's talk page. If you've forgotten your log-in, get a new one! They're free. Finally, please sign your talk page comments with four "tildes" (~~~~) - it's really helpful for tracking a "conversation". Thanks and Happy New Year, if indeed, your New Year is approaching. --Dweller 09:54, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] February 2007

Hi, the recent edit you made to El Cid has been reverted, as it appears to be vandalism. Please do not vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing, or if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks – Qxz 15:37, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. Registering also hides your IP address.

[IP info · Traceroute · WHOIS · Abuse · City · RDNS] · [RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean]