User talk:72.224.168.161
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Your edits on the article on the health fraud "mucoid plaque" are interesting. It would be best to acquire an account with a username. Midgley 08:23, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] contentious material
Simply blanking sections of articles with which you do not agree is not within the policies of WP* - if you feel that something (such as the function of the colon) needs a citation then you may mark it with the fact tag. Any material you dispute should be removed to the talk page, and a discussion of what you reject about it appended. Your single-minded attention to the health fraudulent topic of mucoid plaque is one of the markers that cause me to suspect your motives.
*indeed it is often regarded as vandalism.
Midgley 02:46, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia: Verifiability: "There seems to be a terrible bias among some editors that some sort of random speculative 'I heard it somewhere' pseudo information is to be tagged with a 'needs a cite' tag. Wrong. It should be removed, aggressively, unless it can be sourced." Heelop
- The function of the colon is not random speculative or heard somewhere. It is also sourced. I have requested administrative attention at ANI. Midgley 03:00, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Your blanking appears vandalistic, or worse. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mucoid_plaque&diff=54825915&oldid=54825578
Deleting material that grossly violates Wiki's "non-negotiable" verifiability, and no original research policies does not fit the definition of vandalism. Anybody that does not have respect for Wiki's policies lacks credability. Heelop
[edit] Sign in please
Are you actually User:Heelop? If so, please sign in and use ~~~~ to sign your messages on talk pages. enochlau (talk) 04:13, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
I'm having technological problems with signing in. Give me a little time. I already created an user account but when I used those curvy lines, it displays my computer ID number rather than my user name. Why is that?
You people have repeatedly and grossly violated Wikipedia's verifiability, and no original research policies. You college educated people are smart enough to know what these rules are and how you have violated them. I do not need to waste my time explaining them to you. I have fully studied each of these policies. You act like you have never read these policies. I have gone completely by the rules. Why can't you do the same? Heelop
Take this for example: "A feeling that something inside must be got rid of is common in depressed people, and techniques for producing the appearance of clearing something from the gut give some satisfaction to this." Do I really need to explain how this violates Wikipedia's verifiability, and no original research policies? No published source. Original idea invented by the editor. The "administrators" will readily agree that this violates policy. So stop calling me a vandal because I choose to delete it. Furthermore, everyone can see how immature and unethical this statement is. I make sure that everything I upload conforms with Wikipedia's verifiability, and no original research policies beforehand. Heelop
 | This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. Registering also hides your IP address. [IP info · Traceroute · WHOIS · Abuse · City · RDNS] · [RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean] |
