Talk:AD&D
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation articles on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
[edit] Format of disambiguation pages
Before a certian user reverts this page again, I'd ask that they first look I would ask that they llok at the following pages 1 and 2 to have a better understanding as to why I am constintly resetting the link for Advanced Dungeons & Dragons. Avador 06:27, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
- Having looked, these have absolutely nothing to do with MoS:DP.
- The link to "Advanced Dungeons and Dragons" is a redirect, so the direct D&D link is preferred
- There is no need what-so-ever to have a separate link to "role playing game"
- Apparently, you think I'm ignorant about this topic (implied by your "better understanding" comment). I happened to go to university at a sister mid-western school, and have the original booklets PRE-boxed set, BEFORE it was available to the general public.
- --William Allen Simpson 09:31, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
-
- I do not think that you are in any way ignorent, the reason I changed the link to the redirect was because, there is a strong chance that both edditions of AD&D wikll be getting their own seperate articles, and while you are probably right about rpg link, the last edit I made did to the best of my knowledge, follow the example laid out in MoS:DP, however since you feel so strongly otherwise, and I don't want to waste my time in a childish online edit war, I will back down until I can get the AD&D pages underway. Avador 19:33, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'll help you with an AD&D page, but until it's made there's no point in making a double-redirect - and it is against official style. ··gracefool |☺ 20:01, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
- I do not think that you are in any way ignorent, the reason I changed the link to the redirect was because, there is a strong chance that both edditions of AD&D wikll be getting their own seperate articles, and while you are probably right about rpg link, the last edit I made did to the best of my knowledge, follow the example laid out in MoS:DP, however since you feel so strongly otherwise, and I don't want to waste my time in a childish online edit war, I will back down until I can get the AD&D pages underway. Avador 19:33, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
