Talk:Adenoid
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica is a good book and all, but should a medical source be quoted when it is 95 years out of date?
[edit] Bad heading
I broke up the article into sections, but am still not happy:
The heading is poor: excessive and entirely unnecessary use of medical jargon. The beginning should be something any idiot (like me) could easilly follow.
Could someone with medical training, who can also write in common speach, write a new intro, and then please move the medical textbook description down into the next first subsection? Tom Lougheed 23:37, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Negative skew of article
This article paints an almost entirely negative view of the adenoids. Surely immunology has moved on from the days of "dunno what they're for, let's have them out". 80% of this article describes what can go wrong with them. Surely we know more about their positive function these days? (I came here to find out!)
